In your quest for the infectiousness of viruses, you want to hear all sides of the story. After all, you only take a vaccine if you are convinced that viruses really exist or are at least proven to be contagious. Taking a vaccine because you have to listen to the experts is more reminiscent of "belief that you are a sinner and that you must repent to go to heaven instead of hell. That is a belief imposed by the experts of the church.
I do not believe it until I have seen the proof, and then it is no longer faith either. That evidence must then be firmly substantiated, because the experts of the church can also very well substantiate why you are a sinner and going to hell.
In doing so, by the way, they rely on very old writings. These are enormously well preserved by libraries. They would contain the truth, and old in this case is not synonymous with obsolete. The Catholic Church, for example, has such a library full of centuries-old books. Whether that is evidence then is questionable, because it was the Church that discovered that with the written word first came the ability to spread ideas about distance and time. Pretty handy if you want to make masses believe in your doctrines.
The factcheckers who guard the doctrine of covid belief, by the way, do the opposite as with ancient scriptures. In the case of sin and hell, the doctrine of faith is based on ancient writings; in the case of the contagion faith, ancient writings are waved away as outdated and "from an age when people did not have the proper knowledge. I understand that in itself, and I think this is an argument for many. "Yes, in the time of that Mr. Robert Koch, who wrote the Koch postulates, for example, you didn't have viruses yet. People only knew something about bacteria."
That is an argument I see on fact checkers' websites promoted by Reuters news agency, for example. The University of Auckland New Zealand gives a good example of that in this article. That, by the way, is reversing the argument. Namely, it is argued that Koch had not yet realized that you can have a virus in your blood without getting sick right away. So a virus infection can be asymptomatic (so one now claims), whereas Koch's maxims want to see proof of infection by introducing the sample into a non-sick person.
This reminds me very much of "the sin" of the church. That one is also asymptomatic and has never been shown. That sin has never been shown under an electron microscope either. However, sin is asymptomatic by definition, because you can't see it. Yet the Church's entire doctrine of faith is based on that invisible sin.
The difference, however, is that the virus is said to be imageable and can infect.
However, the problem is that what is claimed to be visualized only arises on a culture based on host cells from (a combination of) monkey cells and fetus cells. Of this one then says, "Well, a virus simply needs a host cell, because without it it cannot multiply."
Wait a minute, so I could also take a blood sample and put it in a Petri dish and the moment I see globules forming I could say, "Look that's the sin that's in your blood. You can only visualize it on culture. See the proof here!"
The worst thing about Koch's postulates is that they were formulated before viruses were known to exist. Viruses aren't like the bacteria that Koch was busy discovering. Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate. In other words, they turn cells into virus-producing factories.
So because Koch thought you had to meet certain rules to prove that something could be infectious and because even then, only and only, could you observe bacteria in a blood sample (without external additives), it is now claimed that "viruses were not known then." No, the fact that the fact checkers are trying to twist into evidence is that viruses arise only in live culture cells in a petri dish. However, the same effect occurs if you grow the same substance in and petri dish, without adding into it a blood sample from a supposedly infected person (read that sentence again and discover the proof in the video below).
In other words. The virus response in the culture sample also occurs, based on the culture sample alone. Thus, adding blood or mucus from a "patient" makes no difference at all (see video below). This is because living cells (which make up the culture sample) produce their own exsosomes when they recognize contamination (such as from dying cells). This is a natural phenomenon. That natural phenomenon is what the covid church has come to call "virus.
By the way, the argument that viruses need a host cell and that you can therefore never isolate a virus from mucus or blood is illogical. After all, blood itself already contains living cells. So why would you need living cells from a monkey or fetus in a Petri dish to provide the putative virus with living cells? Your own blood is already a sample full of living cells. So a simple prick in the finger and then placing that drop of blood in a Petri dish should already make the virus visible under an electron microscope. It never did!
You can only say that viruses are contagious if you find it in one person (person A) who has had no contact with another person (person B). If person A is found to have protein globules in the blood before contact via an electron microscope and you introduce that blood to person B. If you then take a blood sample from person B and the exact same protein globules are found in it, then you can speak of a suspicion of infection (it is not yet conclusive proof). Better would be if you let person A cough into person B's face. After all, according to the theory, the virus is already in small or large fluid droplets.
None of this has ever worked out. Never yet! It has never been possible to transmit a virus from person A to person B. It has never succeeded in imaging a virus in a blood sample (thus containing living host cells, because blood is living) under an electron microscope. And then there is also the question of whether it is this "protein globule," which is called virus, that makes you sick! There is no evidence for it and yet everyone must be vaccinated and exclusion laws are being introduced in countries around the world!
Those fact checkers strike me as the doctrine guardians of the Catholic Church. Only those books that defend the Church's narrative were allowed to remain. For the rest of the books we had the book burnings and those who contradicted the church were heretics. Luther was allowed to be the judas goat who gave critical thinkers a catch-all doctrine. This is not fact checking, this is fact manupilation. The video below provides a clear and thorough substantiation.
Source link entries: auckland.ac.nz
join and support
9 Comments
Groups that refuse to address the contagion lie are Judas goats like Luther. They perpetuate the lie of sin and offer an alternative doctrine. No! Sin is as invisible as the "contagious virus."
Anyone who refuses to address that contagion lie is part of the catch-all fleet:
https://www.martinvrijland.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Judasgoat.mp4
Exosome Theory vs Virus Theory
https://video.wakkeren.nl/w/ofBhQKtxMSXYtE7Tt5iVat
Dr. Sam Bailey - Koch's Postulates: Germ School Dropout
https://video.wakkeren.nl/w/k4e2EfDZi5nERXGSXWQRpp
"What was Koch actually up to in his lab when he formulated his famous postulates? What attempts have been made to keep germ theory alive in the modern era with techniques such as the PCR? Let's have a look into the fraudulent science that started with Koch and continues to the current day."
Dr. Sam Bailey - Unscientific Human Experiments
https://video.wakkeren.nl/w/jWcPfh11VrsJSJDfpHz6cT
"In this video, we look at some human experiments which claimed to show the first "coronaviruses." What went on at this facility and why were there so many human guinea pigs?"
Cov-19 Immunity in 19 Minutes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EdffVJbFxb96/
Kary Mullis - The Full Interview with Gary Null (May 31, 1996).
https://video.wakkeren.nl/w/9BkFRuLPHVEegjY81NzaRz
"Kary Mullis was the inventor of the PCR technology; he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year for his invention.
This interview is from May 1996 and was made by Gary Null in Kary Mullis' home. Kary passed away in August 2019.
Prior to his death, Mullis had said the PCR technology is a research tool. He stated that no infection or illness can be accurately diagnosed with PCR. So it shouldn't be used to diagnose any disease in a human. Kary worked with and knew Dr. Fauci very well. He tells what he thinks of Fauci. He had some really interesting things to say about Fauci's mis-handling of the 'AIDS pandemic'.
He offers his views on a number of subjects from how AIDS was handled by the medial establishment to the scientific method and the integrity of public health officials and the publishers of scientific publications.
R.I.P. Kary Mullis"
Why I Began Questioning HIV (From the House of Numbers Deluxe Edition DVD)
https://video.wakkeren.nl/w/bEezqqDchpwi8wwdNo93Gf
Dr. Stefan Lanka - Why HIV has never been isolated.
https://video.wakkeren.nl/w/x3twpqFtrC4zkiZ517p3Pu
"An interview Huw Christie did with Stefan Lanka in London in 1994."
Another interview, By Celia Farber:
http://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cfmullis.htm
How are viruses discovered and identified in the first place?
The earthshaking Etienne De Harven interview by Celia Farber
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/02/18/how-are-viruses-discovered-and-identified-in-the-first-place/
Gareth Icke Talks To Dr. Tom Cowan About The Invisible Virus & The Covid Cult
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BF32yffm9ilo/
Dr. Tom Cowan - Friday, November 19th, 2021 Webinar
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZYwVKJ13MiLC/
Dr. Tom Cowan - Omicron = anagram for moronic Friday 12/3/21 Webinar
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PpKonZL2WmAg/
Freedom Talk 5 with Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andy Kaufman, and Dean Braus
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nKhPe3mjWTP0/
"Last week, I participated in the latest discussion of the Freedom Talk series with Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andy Kaufman, and Dean Braus. Please enjoy it and share it with your friends."
I have never heard so much nonsense told in succession by a Judas goat (in a studio of another Judas goat). Under the guise of "if we just make it sound so muddled and complicated, people will naturally drop out.
It makes you sick to your stomach.
Disguised "vaccines aren't actually all that dangerous" propaganda and "take the Novavax" advertising for "critics. The virus expert who really doesn't mention the infection lie speaks under the encouragement of Judas goat Tom Swiss:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/viruses-dead-cell-debris_noxfmZZ2lp8LTY8.html
Well no, viruses are proteins created by the body to clean up dead cellular material, among other things. That's a better formulation.
In the article, I forgot to mention the link to the one and a half million fund...:
https://www.samueleckert.net/isolate-truth-fund/