In my August 15 article on the possibility of the existence of chemtrails, I showed the patent showing that graphene oxide can be used for cloud seeding (stimulated cloud formation). I also showed that graphene oxide in jet fuel does not burn, but as a catalyst actually improves the combustion process and thus makes aircraft engines more efficient.
It is important to know that the altitude at which aircraft fly and atmospheric pressure and temperature play a role in the condensation streaks (contrails) behind aircraft. It is a simple physics calculation that shows that water condenses as the air cools after first being heated by the engines. However, graphene oxide may apparently play a role in making those streaks last longer.
Robert Jensen devoted an entire broadcast to chemtrails a few days after that article was published, on Aug. 19. What he rightly tackled was pilots denying the existence of chemtrails. What he rightly tackled were the blue tanks in airplanes at in a photo with Angela Merkel (used for weight distribution in airplane tests). He also highlighted the fact that cloud seeding with dedicated aircraft exists.
However, he waved away the question of whether "it" could be mixed into fuel by showing an e-mail from a reader who reported that that would be far too conspicuous. Then everyone would have to see it when refueling, and besides, it would burn up in the engines. That's where he went wrong, because first you have to see what that "it" is. What is the good that could possibly be mixed into fuel?
Well, in my August 15 article it was substantiated with evidence that, first of all, graphene oxide does not burn, but acts as a catalyst, and secondly, it was substantiated through a patent that it is extremely suitable for cloud seeding.
Aircraft tankers connect a hose to the fuel tanks and there really isn't a drip of it leaking out, which would cause someone on the ground crew to notice anything. Nor does the argument that pilots should know about it hold water, because they get the plane delivered ready for use and really aren't going to check for graphene oxide in the fuel. They can't even do that. Those tanks are in the wings and they don't have a see-through hatch.
Moreover, any mixing of graphene oxide mixed into kerosene does not suddenly make that fuel jet black. We are, of course, talking about a necessary mixing ratio that would hardly change the color at all.
So Robert Jensen either didn't do his homework properly or he had to deliberately infer from the possibility of graphene oxide in fuel shown here (with evidence). He failed to mention it and wrongly waved it away as nonsense.
However, there was something else that struck me. Jensen repeated the oft-repeated comment, "Yes, but if it was sprayed and it was in the fuel, then the elite and the political leaders should also be poisoned by this" And that would then be proof that it is not happening.
Well, if chemtrails were indeed toxic, you could say that, but graphene oxide is not toxic at all. I did show in my August 15 article that it can cause lung problems. Therefore, the function of graphene oxide has not so much to do with poisoning people, but mainly with the antenna function that graphene oxide provides. Let me explain.
The antenna function of graphene oxide has everything to do with the simple fact that graphene has the smallest molecular structure imaginable, composed of pure carbon molecules. Graphene oxide is the oxidized liquid version of that graphene and also has high conductivity. So it conducts electricity and radiation tremendously well. In addition, it thus has a catalytic effect on combustion processes.
If you spray graphene oxide into the air, you could generate an electromagnetic field through a HAARP system, which could locally accelerate cloud formation.
It gets interesting when you inhale graphene oxide. That may (depending on the size of the molecules) irritate the lungs somewhat, but that antenna function is much more important. Take a look at the 2018 presentation below by Dr. Charles Morgan (below) and listen with understanding to what is being said.
It is mainly the antenna function of graphene oxide that provides (what Charles Morgan describes around minute 34 as) "the timed on and off release of information on demand." I have frequently described that here on the website as the "sick on demand" functionality.
If you have been able to inject parts of the population with the CRISPR enzyme via previous rounds of vaccination (like the flu vaccine), then the antenna function of graphene oxide is enough to allow you to target individuals and do "the timed on and off release of information on demand"; or in other words, you can make people sick (or cure them) remotely. But you can do much more.
Graphene oxide, for example, is used by the company Inbrain Neurotechnologies to read and overwrite thoughts in real time. Dr. Charles Morgan also mentions that remote control functionality in his 2018 presentation.
So it is a somewhat naive comment to state that: "If they spray it on everyone, then everyone should also get sick of it; including politicians and the royal family or the WEF people."
No, the antenna function of graphene oxide makes it possible (for example, through the 5G network) to target people individually. Now, many 5G networks were not commercially operational at the beginning of the coronavirus/covid-19 psyop, but the networks were often already installed. Also through HAARP technology you could target entire areas simultaneously.
So when you talk about chemtrails, you have to make the effort to look beyond your nose and delve into a broad arsenal of technologies, as told in the presentation below. Simply dismissing it with a comment like "Well, then everyone should get sick from it," shows a lack of knowledge and an inability to bring the various fields together.
Graphene oxide in fuel was and is an excellent candidate for making people "sick on demand" and keeping the "elite" out of harm's way; it is an excellent candidate for mixing into fuel and vaccines; and it is an excellent candidate for crossing the blood-brain barrier and editing the brain, nervous system or thoughts from the cloud. It can enter your bloodstream undetected by inhalation or through the skin.
And mind you, just graphene oxide in a person's bloodstream and the ability to target the nervous system (remotely) via the brain can make people sick. That nervous system is connected to all organs, like the copper lines on a computer motherboard.
Graphene oxide is therefore ideally suited for spraying through aircraft fuel, it can excellently stimulate cloud formation, and it can very well and covertly be used as a weapon to target individuals or groups and keep others out of harm's way. Vaccines are the ideal means of delivering CRISPR enzymes.
9 Comments
Wonderful analysis!
Besides being able to overwrite people's minds, I think of something else.
"Beam me up Scotty"; Or "`Mary Poppins".
By forming `stargates'; or transport holes, you could beam people up to another place just like that.
There is a patent for that. It's called: "Full body teleportation System" number: US20060071122A1
Frequency-geometry shows that where geometric platonic bodies (such as tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, icosahedron, etc.) 'cross' each other, a walk-through or 'gate' is created. For example, iron is composed of oxygen (8) with the cube, then silicon (6) with the octahedron and then iron (14+12) with the icosahedron No. 26.
Earth is said to have 12 natural "stargates," but these have long since been changed to a mixture of icosahedral dodecahedron with 3300 nodes, where all the important monuments are located (according to Dr. Spilhaus' 1976 discovery). This can apparently be done by manipulation through towers and pyramids, which would have the purpose of keeping the "balance" on earth, or of the "belt" or "dome.
The blowing up of the twin-towers then marked the building of the new 'grid'....
Perhaps the disappearance of MH370 was such an experiment of making it disappear via such a stargate.
But also the Montauk project speaks of such a disappearance experiment via a stargate. Which still went wrong at first because everyone came out completely deformed...https://youtu.be/gHzz_zG0Cm4
To prevent people from completely panicking then, mindcontrol is important then....
But maybe I have too much imagination....
Of course, the whole argument that chemtrails and water additives would not happen because the elite would be exposed to them is flawed anyway.
Poison has been used against people for centuries, and just as old is "antidote." If you cannot avoid being exposed to your "weapon of choice," you make sure you protect yourself from it. With literal poison, that could be an antidote. Everyone gets it, but you have something in your body that neutralizes it and therefore do not experience any effects from it, everyone else does.
The same goes for chemtrails etc. Those who know about it can take measures to protect themselves and/or make themselves more resistant to the mess. Also, it is a combination of things; the masses are not only exposed to what is in the air, but also surround themselves with toxic stuff and contaminated junk that looks like food.
You can assume that those who allow these practices to take place are protecting themselves in as many ways as possible. Not for nothing did Michelle Obama have a vegetable garden. And Bill Gates or the Rothschilds really don't eat "food" from the supermarket....
That "then they'll do it to themselves" argument has been shaky as hell for years.
Martin, I have a question regarding the graphene oxide. You write that it also enters your bloodstream through your skin and through inhalation. If this is so, why the injections?
You have the antenna function (also called bio sensor functionality) of graphene oxide.
You also have the vaccine to inject the CRISPR enzyme. They called that mRNA.
So you have the antenna (also called bio sensor): graphene oxide
And you have the programmable CRISPR enzyme.
You can put both into a syringe (vaccine), but you can also ingest graphene oxide through the lungs (if sprayed in the air) or it can enter through the skin.
Thus, the two together enable remote programming of cells.
Those who cause the "problems" already have the "solution" ready, especially for themselves....
Regarding the question about: Surely the Elite is in it then, if they use that.
Certainly this affects them too, but then you assume they still have something of humanity and the vulnerability that comes with it.
Probably they are already AI in a physical body, perhaps from an earlier non-linear future.
Humanity has been abused by these guys for as long as we've been hanging out here in the matrix.
What is certain is that fear keeps us stuck in this.
Gr
@Marc
So you can target individuals and areas using, for example, the 5G network. So you can also leave them out.
Please read my latest book/essay and the articles mentioned in this article regarding who they are:
https://www.martinvrijland.nl/nieuws-analyses/de-178-domes-en-het-getal-88-donald-trump-en-de-zogenaamde-anti-christ-uitgelegd/
Hi Martin,
True also, read both books.
The content I can place and also explains a lot.
Thank you for writing and keep going.
Pharmaceutics. 2020 Nov; 12(11): 1042.
Published online 2020 Oct 30. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111042
PMCID: PMC7692784
PMID: 33143328
Aerosolizable Lipid Nanoparticles for Pulmonary Delivery of mRNA through Design of Experiments
We identified four formulations possessing higher intracellular protein expression ability in vitro even after aerosolization which were then assessed in in vivo studies. It was found that luciferase protein was predominantly expressed in the mouse lung for the four lead formulations before and after nebulization. This study demonstrated that LNPs hold promise to be applied for aerosolization-mediated pulmonary mRNA delivery.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692784/
DARPA - Defuse project (Problem-reaction-solution)
https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/1583/
Role of Inovio, comments from Salmon:
SalmonInBlik September 9, 2020 at 13:11Reply
@Martin, I would like to hear your opinion on the role of electroporation in the upcoming DNA (mRNA) vaccine. Inovio ism DARPA is making great strides in this and in my opinion AstraZeneca/Moderna is distracting for what is playing out in the background.
INOVIO Receives $71 Million Contract From U.S. Department of Defense To Scale Up Manufacture of CELLECTRA® 3PSP Smart Device and Procurement of CELLECTRA® 2000 for COVID-19 DNA Vaccine