What if it turns out that all legislation in the Netherlands is invalid, the police and judiciary have no authority whatsoever and neither does the court? How long have we seen great injustice imposed on the population by a bunch of puppets of a few wealthy billionaires who want to roll out a Chinese Communist Party-like oppression of the population through institutions like the World Economic Forum, whose puppets are in all cabinets? Well, as of today I offer you the redeeming word: you are free! The system has no authority over you!
For months I have been arguing that the grace of God by which all laws are signed is missing. Even without it, the authority of power would be lacking, but that becomes clear if you read my book/essay "Freedom Can Begin Today. That grace of God is the principle under which "the king" is the boss of the country.
Many times I showed that both the Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations cannot show proof of the grace of God. Nor can the Judicial Council demonstrate the grace of God. And even the Tax Administration is at a loss for words, referring to the Bible as a guide. Today you receive the definitive proof that I was right all along.
What was going on here? It involved a conflict between an employer and an employee who had been sick for a very long time and had always been paid neatly and in full out of leniency. After being declared cured, always being helped and supported by the employer during his illness, the employee decided to put it all on edge anyway. Argument? Because it could be done according to the law (so the man expressed towards colleagues). The recovered employee therefore decided to force the employer into a lengthy and costly reintegration process through a lawyer, despite the verbal agreements already made about returning to work step by step.
However, the employer wanted to pursue the verbally agreed reintegration path, and upon this, decided to let the lawyer know that he had shown enough leniency. He then summarily dismissed the employee. This led to summary proceedings. The employer then brought the following letter to the court to make sure it was received (and read on below):
summary-reaction-to-courtThe night before the court hearing, I still had to convince the employer not to be afraid by reassuring him that he had already won the case by telling the court that it has no authority, after receiving the email below from the employee's lawyer (and read on below).
It was clear that the lawyer was trying to make it known that the employer would not get away with a bill and really needed to appear at the hearing anyway. Fortunately, the employer trusted my advice and decided not to go to the hearing. Risk? An amount of €80,000 to be paid at once.
Normally, the employer would have been immediately convicted in absentia. In addition, the employee's lawyer had explicitly requested that the judgment be issued within 7 days. Today we are exactly two weeks after the hearing date and there is still no verdict.
The website devoordeligstedeuwaarder.nl reports the following about the legal time limit within which summary judgment is rendered:
So usually two weeks. Or shorter if the judge decides otherwise. And normally, under the law, the employer would have been immediately convicted in absentia. Of course, it is still possible that the judge sent the letter to the Public Prosecution Service or Ministry of Justice for consultation. Perhaps he was even invited to the Palace of Huis ten Bosch to consult with Willem Alexander, how to deal with this, but (no kidding) if you ask me it is clear: the grace of God with which all laws are signed is missing. The emperor has no clothes on and the court has no authority.
All those lawsuits conducted by Virus Truth have only helped accelerate jurisprudence. You do not have to listen to the naked emperor's laws, you do not have to listen to the naked emperor's lackeys, and you do not have to appear in his courts. The system is poodle naked! No, not "anarchy leads to chaos," but breaking free from a system based purely on oppression and injustice. For more, check out degratiegods.co.uk and spread the word!
Link entries: devoordeligstedeurwaarder.nl, degratiegods.nl
22 Comments
Note Bene: Of course, I only published this because I can show all the evidence. Let that be clear.
"But you don't have a judgment or verdict yet at all?" No, just like with fines and other cases that you dismiss, you usually don't hear anything then.
Yes, but this leads to anarchy! Please read this:
https://www.martinvrijland.nl/nieuws-analyses/leidt-een-halt-toeroepen-van-de-overheid-tot-anarchie-of-schept-het-de-condities-voor-directe-democratie/
Super good news! Congratulations!!! This strengthens me to continue (with your help) to fight against the bailiff. Let this be a message that gives a lot of people the courage to free themselves. Who doesn't want to be free?
Thank you very much for this post.
I just applied it to a traffic fine. I had previously filed an objection with a handwritten bill addressed to the prosecutor's office indicating the lack of the pardon of God. The response was that CJIB employees who impose orders are authorized to do so. Then a story about traffic safety etc. Other reasons were said to be inadequate or insufficiently substantiated in the handwritten bill.
So now rejected the possibility of appeal to the subdistrict court and further adopted your text including the appendix. Seems to me that it is now sufficiently substantiated.
If you appeal you have to pay the fine already, they call it providing security. Since I reject the appeal and thus do not pay, I do not provide security either.
Am curious,
I'll keep you posted.
Fine Jeroen.
It is indeed not an objection, but a notification that the you reject the fine.
Indeed, if you object, you are basically indicating that the system has the right to issue traffic fines, but at most you object to the content. No: you reject the fine!
So far this has worked for all traffic fines (as far as those sent to me).
Do be a bit careful when not paying traffic fines. In my case, the amount (82 euros) was removed from my ING account without pardon, without warning and without my permission. Not reversible. I called ING and then you get the answer 'we have to do that'. Then I emptied and terminated the bank account. Now I have an online bank account with Revolut (Lithuania) and with N26 (Germany). The Dutch government can't touch those (yet). Be warned!
If you pay nothing that happens. So does if you object. If you reject the fine with the appropriate text(http://www.degratiegods.nl), you hear nothing more.
And what if you don't have any money in your account? Do they then debit so you end up in the minus (even if you have the option to be in the red off)?
It also works here in France, although I haven't found grace gods in the legislation.
I received a speeding fine in the spring. I then sent the message that I reject their request for payment because I do not agree with their supposed authority and do not enter into a contract with them. In doing so, no one was victimized so no crime took place.
I then received a letter telling me to object via their form and return it by registered mail. I reminded them again that I do not recognize their authority and that I reject the payment request.
Two months later came a letter from a bailiff asking me to transfer the amount, now 5x higher than the original, anyway. You understand my reaction to this: I reject the request and do not accept extortion.
I also sent them this quote from the relevant traffic law: "l'autorité investie du pouvoir de police" (The authority entrusted to the police force) and asked them who entrusted this authority to the police and where I can find proof of this authority.
We are now 10 weeks since my last response and I have heard nothing more.
Voir! Très bien fait! Et merci pour le témoignage !
Merci et avec plaisir !
This is where I get a very nice warm feeling 😀
Wonderful to read Martin, you really do save people from destruction by the Government and the lackeys.
I once bought your business cards and I am constantly handing them out to family and friends. My whole family is pro vaccination and pro government, now we are 4 weeks on and I have already managed to convince 10 people to take the first step (and succeeded:)).
As an example I added my own letter including your documents from degratiegods and showed my family how it works and in the beginning you notice a lot of resistance to this and even my mother has now changed and no longer believes anything people say, my thanks Martin! Since last month I have completely stopped paying payment arrangements regarding health care and rent allowance. This month I will start it up regarding health insurance and stop paying all municipal taxes.
For anyone who has doubts and is going to "sweat" from it beforehand, I had this same thing. I was really terrified to go through with it, but once I did, I can see that people really can't do anything to you. In all those weeks I haven't seen any police or the like, did get letters back that I have to pay, because otherwise etc... but just send another notice back + add a fine of 1 million euros for continuing to harass and after that it stays mouse quiet hahahaha.
Martin, good weekend and keep up the good work!!!
Just want to pass along here to the readers how things are going if you don't take health insurance. If you cancel your insurance by January 1, April 1 you get a letter from the CAK that you have to have insurance by July 1 and otherwise you risk a penalty and they then take out insurance for you. So the rejection letter sent to CAK needs to be adjusted and is not contract-based.
Will any care costs incurred be recovered from the person?
You can send the CAK itself a letter that the obligation is there because of legislation and that legislation is invalid.
The word care is Orwellian newspeak. I wouldn't use that anymore. At least anyone who understood the corona psyop. should see that through by now.
You don't need care, you need healing when you are sick. And healing they don't do a hospital.
But if you do have to go to a hospital, you just get a bill.
When I explain to those around me how
health insurance is not actually mandatory, the first thing they say is: suppose something happens! People really need to let that go.
This morning I was looking for the legal provision on signatures and especially the preamble, because I wanted to find out for myself how this is described. I ended up on wikipedia and read the following text,
"The 2016 Proposal for a Kingdom Act by Member Van Veldhoven to regulate the forms of promulgation of laws and Kingdom laws and of notification by the King to the States General of his decree on any proposal of law or Kingdom law (Kingdom Act on promulgation and notification forms) included the abolition of 'by the grace of God'. It expired in 2022 due to lack of initiators[2][3] (the original proposer is no longer a Member of Parliament).
A request based on the Open Government Act to disclose information on the evidence of the "pardon of God" in 2022 could not be granted because no documents on it were found at the Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations."[4]
The rats are trying to plug the holes then I guess and what effect will this have on the found "running burrow"?
Sigh!
I keep repeating it, because I have said it here so many times: A proposal by a member of parliament and a chamber debate is nothing more than that: a staged play in the second chamber of actors all sworn in by that same king.
There is no loophole to close. I would recommend re-reading the letter in the article above. Therein it is neatly explained. The kingship itself is based on the grace of God and the king signs the laws by the grace of God. chamber discussions intended to give the impression that it is all just an unimportant preamble are nothing more than that "chamber discussions.
It cannot be closed. The fact is that on paper the king is the final authority and therefore signs the laws. If you read a bit more the articles linked in the second paragraph, you will also find that only refer to the Bible (Romans XIII).
That the king's lackeys (read: anyone who makes a living from the system) will try tooth and nail to defend that it is only a formality is because they are the naked emperor's lackeys.
It is not a loophole, it is crystal clear and incontrovertible: you are free.
What about the people who have a state pension/benefit may they or can they just stop it if you don't cooperate with the system, as I know many people who have that.
The system will do everything it can to work against people, so it could.
It is not easy to start doing things differently, but it can be done.
Benefits are the beginning of dependency, and that dependency will grow more and more if we don't stop the process _____.
So how to do it differently? I once founded a website for that: http://www.fvvd.nl (direct democracy)
But you can also scale down and organize things locally within communities.
People on welfare may be good gardeners or have other qualities that you can share as a community.
Where there is a will, there is a way; where there is no will, the way is dead.
It starts with seeing through the necessity and the path that otherwise leads to a Chinese model of a totalitarian regime.
Just another thing. Gert Oostindie has been appointed by our king to investigate our colonial past. How do you come up with such a name.