The arguments for vaccinating all start from the official figures presented by government agencies most of which have an indirect or direct line to the pharmaceutical industry and/or Bill Gates; if only because of the largest financial package of support in WHO that comes from Gates.
You can only speak of genuinely pure and unmanipulated figures if you are sure that there are no conflicts of interest. Although seemingly no direct lines seem to exist towards the industry, everyone has an image of people like Ab Osterhaus, Hugo de Jonge and Diederik Gommers. However, the propaganda media are always able to nicely polish what is smeared.
Most alternative media rely on figures from the RIVM or international institutes. Robert Jensen, for example, cites those figures in most of his shows and then states that it all means nothing. Other channels also do not question the official figures at all. I wouldn't want to take all that at face value.
The premise, that the official infection rates are correct and thus the rise or fall graphs, is already a wrong starting point. Why? Are those figure-producing agencies then not to be trusted? That immediately sounds conspiracy-minded. Let me then point to the history of 80 years ago and ask the question, "Since when has the nature of power changed so much that we are sure we can trust governments blindly?"
A piece of history according to mainstream historiography: Some 75 million people died in World War II, including about 20 million military personnel and 40 million civilians, many of whom died as a result of deliberate genocide, massacres, massive bombing, disease and famine(source).
Is it certain that governments can be trusted or do we Westerners consider ourselves so developed that we are certain that figures like Adolf Hitler can never be put in charge again. He didn't do it alone. He managed to get many ministers and officials, but actually whole tribes of people behind him; with great ease and with propaganda means that can now be considered antique. And these were usually people with neat little families at home.
Just look at the demonic, almost enjoyable look when this Australian Jaap van Dissel, named Kerry Chant, announces that you should count on being permanently fucked. When you have recovered from the shock, read on below the video and also remember that yours truly predicted what this monster says.
Assuming that governments can be completely trusted and the media does not play a propaganda role; assuming that we are actually dealing with a terribly dangerous invisible enemy, which also mutates, all arguments for vaccinating seem justified. Let's borrow an example of such arguments from an "extremely independent" blog(this one).
Arguments for vaccinating
- According to the latest British research, you are 49% less likely to be infected by Delta if you are fully vaccinated.
- Unfortunately, you do appear to be exactly as contagious as unvaccinated people if you do get infected.
- Delta is 50% more contagious than Alpha, and Alpha was 50% more contagious than the original corona. It is so contagious that you can even be infected by someone just walking by you outside within 60 cm distance.
The aforementioned blog uncritically assumes the truth of such studies. You may do the same. Personally, I seriously consider that we may be dealing with governments willing to fabricate investigative reports that support the desired storyline (script). However, I will be neutral and consider your confidence.
The following reasoning should then convince you that you are doing the right thing if you allow yourself to be vaccinated indefinitely (quote from the article):
2 x 50% more chance of infection, but 49% less for those vaccinated.
1.5 x 1.5 x 0.51 = 15% more. In other words, you now have 15% more chance.
Remember when we all thought it was important to protect the weak in April 2020? Stay home!" we said to each other. You now, as a fully vaccinated person, have 15% more chance of being infected by Delta than you had in 2020 with the original corona. While then you were not vaccinated at all.
In Israel, the best-vaccinated country in the world, the number of hospitalizations is now rising faster than ever before.
Of course, these are partly unvaccinated children, but not only. It's partly unvaccinated children, but not only. There are also just a lot of vaccinated people who get very seriously ill. It turns out that our best vaccine, Pfizer, is a lot less effective after only three months, and it turns out that people with poor immunity, such as the elderly and some sick people, experience very little effect from vaccines anyway. There are some 1 million adult Dutch people who cannot be vaccinated effectively because of immuno-problems. According to Timen (RIVM), there are more than 700,000 people alone who are vaccinated but where the vaccine does not work optimally.
And then comes the comment, Please, get vaccinated.
Did you see any critical questioning of the points mentioned? For example, on point 1: How, where, when, over what period of time and among how many people did they measure it?
Anyone who has studied the PCR test knows that the number of cycles used to enlarge DNA traces would determine whether you are infected, but in fact it is not a measurement of infection, but measurement of pieces of DNA supposedly from the virus that has never been isolated; has never been taken from a supposed patient.
How exactly can you arrive at an infectivity percentage and then state that variant Delta is 50% more infectious than variant Alpha. Moreover, the question also applies here: can you show me the isolated version of the virus from an allegedly infected person and then indicate on the basis of which you determined which variant it is?
Are you impressed by the graph? You can be, but personally I assume it is nothing more than a graph. You can tell people anything when you show a graph. Graphs have become a kind of holy grail of truth. I am particularly impressed by the fact that the country with the highest vaccination coverage, has the biggest problems.
Why take vaccines if you can still infect or be infected? The argument then is "at least you slow it all down a bit." That is what the research reports shown are for, but the factual evidence is not there, because people have never isolated both the alpha variant and the delta variant (or any variant). They are artist impressions we are shown.
Officially, you have to do that isolation of a virus by the method of Koch's postulates. I won't overcomplicate it, but that method is not actually used because the most important element for proof has been removed. If you want to know more about that, read this.
Viruses have never been isolated in a living person. You can't image them. One assumes a hypothetical genetic makeup of a virus. If that hypothetical DNA, which would make up a coronavirus, is found (magnified) through a PCR test, one asserts that you have a virus. That is like finding a Mercedes logo in a pile of wrecked cars and then assuming there is a fully running (in tact) Mercedes in the junkyard.
The arguments for vaccinating are very weak; especially considering that it is all based on a belief. This belief is based on figures and graphs from institutes that usually receive a financial incentive from the pharmaceutical industry or the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation.
It is the belief in infections and the belief in an invisible mutating enemy that is becoming more and more contagious. Besides the Photoshop pictures of the virus, have you ever seen a virus in a blood sample?
Arguments against vaccinating
- Viruses have never been isolated from a putative patient
- The inventor of the contagion theory and de facto founder of the vaccine industry, not only tallied his own studies (which was evident from his private records), but also admitted before his death that not his theory, but that of contemporary Béchamp was correct: "It is not contagious viruses, but it is environmental pollution that makes people sick."
- Many studies in the past have shown that a virus is not transmissible. That this now appears to be the case in current perception (via the media) is because you are kept in that illusion via propaganda images, figures and graphs. The propaganda methods have been described frequently and extensively here on the website, including real-life examples of deliberate manipulation of the news.
- The mRNA vaccines have never been used before and the long-term effects are simply not known and so you are participating in an experiment.
It remains the great argument for pro-vaccination views: if a virus were non-infectious, why do so many people get sick in succession? If viruses do not exist - or rather "if viruses are a body's own cleaning response for cleaning up external contamination " - and are not contagious at all, how is it that people get sick sequentially or simultaneously?
That question could be answered if you do forensics, but in fact we can easily and clearly pinpoint several factors, including the psychological shock effect or mouth caps (inhaling your own CO2). Far more important, however, is to point out that people could have been administered "a certain good" through the nasal test.
That "particular goodie" I am referring to is now called mRNA, but actually we are dealing with a CRISPR enzyme that provides read and write functionality. You can use it to program human DNA remotely (see this commentary).
It is pretended that that mRNA in the vaccine gives only 1 command to the cell - namely, the command to make a spike protein that then activates an antibody response - but what is not said is that, in addition, it actually creates the ability to give your DNA any command one wants; even to modify it.
To do so, you would need a pulse generator, just as light pulses over the Internet transport your browser's code over fiber optic cables. The possibility exists to give commands to the CRISPR enzyme via electromagnetic pulses. This is all possible since the discovery of graphene (usually the collective name for graphene including graphene oxides). Graphene makes remote reading and writing possible because graphene offers high biosensor capabilities.
BioNtech (the company that marketed a vaccine with Pfizer) had an intranasal vaccine to deliver "a certain goodie" into your bloodstream as early as 2019.
The active administration of a remote control CRISPR enzyme (mainstream technology) makes it possible, at a time of your choosing, to make people sick or die, allowing you to implement a new "wave of infection." That new wave(the upcoming tsunami - mark my words) should then convince everyone to think "you see how dangerous that virus is and how horrible the mutations are!"
In this article I explained how the unvaccinated will be labeled as walking time bombs and how this stigma of "walking time bombs" lowers the threshold for fascist action. We have thus entered the era of concentration camps with the friendly title "quarantine facility.
So it is very important to understand that viruses are not contagious, but the contagion propaganda can be confirmed by many sick and dead because of the remote control functionality brought in; by "sick on demand.
How mass hypnosis and propaganda play an important role in the road to acceptance, I explain here.
Do you want to study how that contagion lie has already been debunked many times? Do you want to understand why contagions are a lie? Then you will find a whole laundry list here. Do you want to make study of the CRYSPR remote control functionality? Then really read this article carefully.
If this article was enlightening for you. If you see that we are being massively played. If you see that the propaganda is massive. Then keep sharing despite social media blocking the share counters below and despite censorship. Now more than ever, it is important to wake up as many people as possible. That is why it is important to be able to continue and support. Only by fighting together do we win. Thank you!
become a memberSource link entries: story.co.uk, lumenlearning.com, grutjes.co.uk, spiral.imperial.ac.uk, nationalgeographic.com, medrxiv.org, yalemedicine.org, twitter.com
12 Comments
As always, we do get "informed," only it's all very nicely packaged:
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210502/Could-CRISPR-be-used-as-a-SARS-CoV-2-antiviral.aspx
Fortunately, salvation is at hand. Yep, like it's not already being used....
The unvaccinated are being blamed for cojona not going away.
Will this group also be blamed soon, when the regular flu returns from vacation?
"There are lies, damned lies and statistics" - Mark Twain
The greatest trick the (D)evil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
We stand together before the judgment
to choose good or evil,
a people who yield to tyrants,
will lose more than life and limb,
then the light goes out.
but oh hey that was back then.........
Beautiful and appropriate quotes William.
It's incredible how people swallow such a story from that monster too. I literally get nauseous when I see and hear her talk. Just like Rutte and that other Jan Doedel. I can't watch it. And the whole of the Netherlands follows it like an exciting soap opera.
I find that the worst of all. Not that whole script that is being executed (also terrible), but how all those people fall for it. So blind.
And suppose, that contamination theory would be truth (which I do not believe in), what is the problem of contamination (believe you should say infection) ? For a virus with an IFR of 0.15% (and that's a long time ago) ? A virus where the average age of those who die is higher than the average life expectancy ?
Everything is turned upside down; the healthy quarantined, the healthy put on "medication," the healthy on watch, etc.
Well Martin,
The mantra it's safe and effective, it's approved and it's tested to excess also goes up in smoke.
https://www.rivm.nl/vasco
Hugootje lies that it is printed with his mantras, of course we already knew this but I wonder what the covidians think about this now.
So far I get no response i least on any forum where I show this, people seem to be enchanted.
Nice piece again too, clear as day, this should be covered by the dailies so is also clear what role they play.
i have thought for a long time now that if, some
day, the increasing efficiency for the technique of
destruction finally causes our species to disappear from
the earth, it will not be cruelty that will be responsible
for our extinction and still less, of course, the
indignation that cruelty awakens and the reprisals and vengeance that it brings upon itself . . .
but the docility, the lack of responsibility of the modern man,
his base subservient acceptance of every common
decree. The horrors that we have seen, the still greater
horrors we shall presently see, are not signs that rebels ,
insubordinate, untamable men are increasing in number
throughout the world, but rather that there is a constant
increase in the number of obedient, docile men.
George Bernanos
Unfortunatly it is so true
Why do children who have not had the vax-of-nations(listen how it sounds) end up in the hospital? In the first year of the pandemic there were no problems at all for children. Why now? Because during the lockdown 5 g was installed at school and it is set to certain frequencies, according as one likes. And most children have already been sprayed full of poison in their younger years. When I see what schools have remodeled...they received quite a bit of money to implement the covid measures. My whole feeling can't stand that (people) do anything for money.3