When I saw the interview below by Stew Peters with Dr. Bryan Ardis, I was immediately skeptical because of the slickness, the apparent presence of NLP techniques and the American presentation style you recognize from the average Fox News show and other mainstream media.
More on that later. For now, I want to share the content with you so you can judge it for yourself. Dr. Bryan Ardis actually states that covid-19 is a synthetically produced (king cobra) snake venom spread through drinking water.
Without any further ado. Let me know what you think.
Update 15-04-2022
As I hinted at in the introduction to this article, here we are witnessing the creation of a new "rabbit hole. Because the script performers are losing their grip on the population (their credibility), they need to establish a new storyline. This time I thought it would be useful not to regurgitate the 'controlled opposition' conclusion myself for once, but to see if you see it for yourself. So I recommend taking a moment to read the comments below this article.
Especially when you see Jim Fetzer (who now calls himself James Fetzer) pop up on the story, you have to hit the brakes. Jim Fetzer was the man who blew up the 911-truth movement by giving the front man of that movement (Ace Baker) a stage on his radio show, in which Ace Baker said goodbye to his wife and children only to shoot himself through the head live. Not much later, however, Ace Baker turned out to be just alive and kicking again.
Yes, people have been made sick to fake the infections and the mRNA story is probably a cover story for the CRISPR enzyme (watch that video) and graphene oxide combined with radiation sources (one of which is mostly in your pocket or on your wrist all day) and others installed before they were officially commercially operational.
The first wave of disease may have been realized through a variety of methods, not ruling out the possibility that there are bits of truth in the Ardis story (as the "controlled opposition" more often mixes truth with disinfo), but the root cause is the "sick on demand" method discussed so much here on the site, which may also be applied in any yet-to-be-followed future pandemic hoaxes to make people sick (and thus fake the infections).
Of course, the main association that Dr. Bryan Ardis must evoke is that of the snake oil salesman; a common phrase used to describe someone selling a worthless or fraudulent remedy or solution.
28 Comments
Venom is somewhat different from a toxin. Venom will only kill you if it enters your bloodstream directly.
Fun fact: Ardis sells a so-called anti-V-collection of quercitin, vitamin C, NAC and zinc for a bizarre price.
Ultimately, this narrative is just to convince people that Covaids has a natural origin. All we need are unique clinical symptoms for this fake disease.
Ardis is literally a snake oil salesman. Who your research before you go along with this kind of incredible bullshit.
Did you hear me say anywhere that I go along with this kind of "incredible bullshit"?
Reading well is apparently still an art.
It was meant in general. Not personally.
All the supposedly "woke" people suddenly come up with this bullshit story. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
Yes this does say enough as far as I am concerned.
https://thedrardisshow.com/the-anti-v-collection-ardislabs
A literal snake oil salesman.
After all, Shill Peters viewers have already been indoctrinated to such an extent by Carrie "Academy of Divine Knowledge Hydra Vulgaris" Madej, and Russell "Harari Hugger" Brand, that this is not such a big mental step anymore.
Bat soup, Wuhan Labs, Biolabs, lab leaks. And now cobra venom
Without an in-depth analysis, it is, in my opinion, BS. Among other things, it may further discredit opponents of the narrative. When you arrive with this to people you might want to wake up, you come across as very implausible.
Apart from everything else. Also apart from all the facts surrounding the symbolism in "secret societies."
And oh... on Twitter there are already all kinds of recipes for antidotes circulating ....
This contributes to mass formation psychosis. Everyone must be kept in this fear psychosis. Vaxxers and antivaxxers
I thought it was ingeniously made up. Can quite imagine that something would be spread via drinking water and at least it also supports the fact that it is not an infectious virus.
I thought it was an interesting documentary/film. Regardless of whether it is true and I have done no further research, I found that Dr. Bryan Ardis was able to explain and relate many things well.
Things like:
- the connections between the various firms in the film, linked via via;
- the connection between loss of taste (after going through the poisoning) and that smokers seemed less susceptible to it;
- that waves of contamination could be created in certain regions and one could trace this through the sewers quite quickly.
In any case, I do not believe in the virus theory and I do believe in the power of the human body's self-healing ability.
By applying these tactics, if possible, I would not find this story illogical.
As mentioned, I don't know if it is true and could just be a diversion.
he also says it is in the vaccines, this i find more believable, would explain the complaints of course. i put it under the "what if it is true" 🙂 not everything one reads on the internet is true and not everything is a lie martin 🙂
BS !!! Livestock and pets apparently didn't drink tap water....
How much does it take to flush all the toilets, water plants and, oh yes also drink....
Sharp!
off topic: Anyone else surprised with the announcement of burdenvwr increases and holes in the budget? Also the proposal to hit SMEs earlier for the higher rate? And of course it is once again the already 2 months conflict which is messing up the financial housekeeping.
Apart from all NLP techniques (also watch the interviewer!) , I think he should come up with proof: take some samples of tap water and show that it contains snake venom. Still interesting that bit about loss of taste and about being unable to breathe due to paralysis of the diaphragm. Personally, I think the loss of taste could be due to the PCR test itself. But then you would actually have to look closely to see if the taste loss was there before the test, or only occurred after.
Am no expert, so that leaves considering the ramblings an sich of Ardis to "sell" the story.
To me, the intention is to lose ourselves in a storyline again.
With (snake) venom, "crown" (corona, 666, etc. ) you can go in any direction, i.e. construct thousands of stories. We're just busy there, figuring out signals, subliminal messages, correlations, etc.).
The population is getting ready to listen to message variants other than the MSM. It is becoming more and more open to the "alternative media. But that too is controlled. From there you can fool that population - because of that diffuse fear it has - again, because in the meantime they are like death. ("Oh dear, nothing turns out to be what it seems, the 'wappies' are right... etc.). ).
It works credibly by getting more and more "supposedly out of the cover-up. What comes out of that is beyond the population's imagination. That's how you create even more fear.
Fear makes the population susceptible to nonsense stories.
Here I hear between the lines, freely translated, "OMG, it wasn't a virus, but a produced poison.
1. So work is being done to keep a narrative afloat.
2. A diffuse fear is being built: 'OMG: we are being poisoned'.
Re 1. This is a repetition of moves
ad 2. The in my experience 'over-acted' dismay by Ardis about this is supposed to suggest that we should not be able to be poisoned. (While of course - if we want to see that, of course - we know that is the harsh reality of every day, it is far worse than one can imagine, but yes: one keeps 'taking candy from a stranger'. The water has not been right for decades, weakly put).
Last but not least: the introduction of this clip by that presenter: this one plays the indignation while noting everything is read from auto cue, which he tries to disguise by coming across as real as possible (angry, indignant).
So I see mostly theater, and "funnel marketing" of all those guys involved in communicating this "evil program.
The whole herd has to go back into the pen.
Exactly!
Or to speak with Pink Floyd:
Run, rabbit, run
Dig that hole, forget the sun
When at last the work is done
Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
Long you live and high you fly
But only if you ride the tide
Balanced on the biggest wave
You race towards an early grave
First of all, I think the presentation style is really American and I see many acting phenomena in Ardis, his facial expressions, his hand movements, his way of speaking (although many Americans, especially actors, speak like that) and I do recognize some NLP techniques here and there, but I would have to listen better via my laptop instead of my mobile phone. The background music also takes you at a certain moment (also a technique to convince you subconsciously).
The contamination lie is confirmed with his story, so also that mouth masks don't work is confirmed, but we already knew that.
The CRISPR technique is also confirmed, the 'terrain theory' is also more or less confirmed by him.
Linking firms together should make his story more powerful and thus more credible, but I have not checked this.
I think he speaks mostly for his own parish and his story could be partly true, at least the idea of the way to make people sick, but his outlined way seems strong to me.
In any case, he does give you food for thought.
The NLP techniques:
in this video of Stew and his actor masonic buddy:
1. stir up anger (excite emotion)
2. focusing the emotion on young children
3. focus attention on that one raised finger of "Dr. Ardis"
4. lower volume of microphone so listener has to focus better because it is "so important" (what is he saying now1?)
5. excite emotion on the murdered researcher with Chinese name, which comes back to the back of the dessert at the end (refocus: hypnotic anchor)
6. image flashing (see my earlier explanation of this in my NLP articles - Derren Brown)
7. ask the question and let yourself fill in the answer (get the hypnotic anchor in mind)
8. the music and camera focus, built-in speaking pauses
9. etcetera
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3qAPZEzOP2v8/
One last point. Venom is highly reactive. This basically means that there are parts of all enzymes that will want to bond with elements (usually oxygen, but also chlorine and others) that will reduce its electrical potential. That is to say, make it more 'relaxed' and far less reactive. Thus the idea of dumping any venom, snake or other critter, into a water system is silly. Venom would encounter vast amounts of oxygen, chlorine and all the other chemicals currently polluting the planet. It would be very very unlikely that the venom would survive in a reactive state that would be able to injure your body. And, if the venom was made into a more water stable product, by that very process, it would no longer be reactive enough to cause harm.
https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/watch-the-water?s=r
Interesting study
Nanoparticles Functionalized with Venom-Derived Peptides and Toxins for Pharmaceutical Application
Venom-derived peptides display diverse biological and pharmacological activities, making them useful in drug discovery platforms and for a wide range of applications in medicine and pharmaceutical biotechnology.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31223083/
Sewage as harbinger of corona, RIVM will measure more
ANP - 17-08-2020, 19:03
There will be more test points at water treatment plants with which the RIVM wants to chart the advance of the coronavirus. The number of test points will go from eighty to three hundred.
https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2344455-rioolwater-als-voorbode-voor-corona-rivm-gaat-meer-meten
Pretty clever that a virus that could not even be isolated from sputum can now suddenly be isolated from sewage!
What was the rivm doing at water treatment plants in the first place?
Ik haal uit verhalen wat de betekenis voor mezelf is en laat, zo lang we zaken niet zeker weten, het niet-weten voor wat het is. Het verkondigen van absolute zekerheden, van welke aard en van wie dan ook, is voor mij altijd te wantrouwen. Niet in die zin dat het dan betekent dat de persoon in kwestie niet te vertrouwen is in wat hij/zegt (de oprechtheid dus), hoewel het perfect mogelijk is dat iemand niet betrouwbaar kan zijn, blijft het altijd neerkomen op de idee: de juiste weg van de ene kan een dwaalspoor zijn voor de andere.
Iedereen die verkondigt: ‘Mijn weg is de juiste’, is m.i. extra te wantrouwen als ik erdoor meegesleept word, want dat leidt me af van de autoriteit van mijn intuïtie/mijn Zelf.
Er is m.i. slechts één autoriteit die ik waarlijk kan vertrouwen en dat is die van mijn Zelf, voor zover ik de weg van individuatie al ben aangegaan en ik intuïtie dus kan onderscheiden van angsten , emotie en dergelijke. Of het nu de zoveelste leugen is die wordt verkondigd of de zoveelste ontmaskering is van controlled opposition: voor mij blijft het steeds een inkeer, een zoeken naar de vraag ‘waarom doet dit verhaal zoveel met me? Welk stuk van mezelf krijgt onvoldoende aandacht waardoor ik hier nu zo uitgesproken positief of negatief op reageer?’
Hoe vervelend een boodschap ook moge zijn, ik tracht altijd om er een dienstbare betekenis voor mezelf uit te halen. In dit geval:
– verspreiding van wat dan ook via water is plausibel (kan in het verleden al gebeurd zijn, in het nu aan het gebeuren zijn of een aankondiging voor in de toekomst). Ik was van plan een waterreservoir/regenton aan te kopen en te investeren in een waterfilter. Dit verhaal zet me aan hier mee door te zetten. Of het nu controp is of niet, of ik nu compleet paranoïde ben of niet: in elk geval is het zinvol om dit te doen voor mezelf. Bedankt verhaal om me even aan te sporen hier verder mee te gaan.
– De symboliek van de slang: zeer interessant. Naar mijn aanvoelen slaan diep onbewuste archetypen veel beter aan dan NLP, dus het loont de moeite voor mezelf te gaan kijken naar wat het slang-archetype voor me betekent. Zonder te veel in detail te treden, heb ik dankzij dit verhaal voor mezelf de vraag gesteld: ‘In welke mate word ik vergiftigd? hetzij letterlijk, hetzij symbolisch, hetzij beide?’ en ben ik daar verder mee aan de slag gegaan (en nog verder mee bezig). Het heeft me heel wat nuttige insteken geleverd waar ik bij mezelf mee aan de slag kan. Dank u wel verhaal, om het archetype aan te reiken. Het had duidelijk nood aan aandacht en transformatie binnenin.
– Ik zie het bestaan van controlled opposition steeds minder als probleem, en nog meer mede dankzij dit verhaal. Het is pas een probleem, als we elkaar gaan wantrouwen op vlakken waar dat wantrouwen niet terecht is en we het te veel aandacht geven, die het misschien niet verdient. Het is pas een probleem als je compleet meegesleept wordt in de angst. Ik mag hopen dat mensen na alles wat ons al overkomen is qua leugens en bedrog, de weg in zichzelf gaan zoeken. Als we letterlijk leven in een soort simulatie, dan zal dat trouwens mogelijks ook de enige weg eruit zijn.
Dus mijn insteek, hoewel ik heel verheugd ben dat er mensen controlled opposition willen blijven ontmaskeren, ligt in de diepte: wat maakt dat we ons zoveel zorgen maken om controp? Uiteindelijk kan het altijd iets van waarheid aan de dag leggen (zoals je zelf ook stelt) en zegt het iets over de wanhoopspogingen die ze stellen. Bovendien geeft het een optie om in jezelf te gaan kijken en voor jezelf uit te maken wat er nog niet helemaal in balans in binnenin als je flipt op een verhaal, dus ook op een controp verhaal. Allemaal zinvol.
De enige autoriteit die we nog zouden moeten volgen, is die van het Zelf. Het is onmogelijk voor iemand anders om te bepalen of een ander die wel/niet volgt. Als je voldoende balans binnenin hebt, dan lijkt het mij niet schadelijk en zelfs ietwat in ons voordeel dat er controp bestaat. Maar… het lijkt me niet zozeer de angst die wordt gezaaid die het grootste probleem is (hoewel het problematisch kan zijn), dan wel de verdeeldheid onder ons onderling en de aandacht die eraan wordt besteed vanuit het collectief (dus ook van mij nu door hierop te antwoorden).
Naar mijn gevoel is het gewoon belangrijk dat we allemaal de weg naar binnen gaan met zulke verhalen en er voor onszelf uithalen wat dienstbaar is. Of dat nu met feiten is, controp-verhalen, of sprookjes: het lijkt me altijd zinvol om de weg naar binnen te doen als een verhaal je in de positieve of negatieve zin ‘roept’.
Ik hoop hiermee niet onrespectvol over te komen, Martin, want dat is geenszins mijn bedoeling.
Ik persoonlijk lees je analyses altijd met veel waardering, maar maak me tegelijk ook wat zorgen over het zaaien van wantrouwen, dat me, indien onterecht, misschien even ‘schadelijk’ lijkt als die van onterechte angst. Maar ja…wat als het terecht is? Ik vind het een moeilijke, maar apprecieer zeker je vastberadenheid en dat je voor jezelf op bovenstaande vraag wel een antwoord lijkt te hebben gevonden. Mocht je het willen delen, zou dat fijn zijn. Misschien geraak ik er zelf op die manier ook wel uit. Indien niet, dan zal ik er ooit ook wel uit geraken 😉
I understand your point of view, but just give one example (again) of controlled opposition to show how important it is to be aware of it:
Yes, it is indeed important to be aware of it. Until 2 years ago, I had never even heard of it. I can also imagine that if you have been at this for a long time, you get better and better at figuring it out. Keep debunking, Martin. It keeps the mind sharp. Everyone's role. I'm more for the introspection and the idea of "what are we to do with this?" and in that sense, it's also kind of good that people are invited over and over again not to go looking for "the savior" externally, but always within.
Ultimately, the problem of starting struggles among ourselves is also not the unmasking of controp. It may be an occasion for struggle (which means we unconsciously go along with the script ourselves and in a sense are ourselves unconscious controp when we do so), but that doesn't actually make us start avoiding that occasion. Rather, it is responding to each other out of respect and being able to bear the diversity that we will have to work on if we are to be a powerful unit.
I think I'm getting there now. Thank you very much for your response.
well why am I not surprised....
"Yes, people have been made sick to fake the infections and the mRNA story is probably a cover story for the CRISPR enzyme (watch that video) and graphene oxide combined with radiation sources (one of which is mostly in your pocket or on your wrist all day) and others were installed before they were officially commercially operational."
Professor Jennifer Doudna in her lab at UC Berkeley. Doudna and her colleagues rocked the research world in 2012 by describing a simple way of editing the DNA of any organism using an RNA-guided protein found in bacteria. This technology, called CRISPR-Cas9, has opened the floodgates of possibility for human and non-human applications of gene editing, including assisting researchers in the fight against HIV, sickle cell disease and muscular dystrophy.
Further inspired by her high school chemistry teacher, Jennifer Doudna studied biochemistry at Pomona College in Claremont, California, earning her bachelor's degree in 1985. She undertook graduate studies in biological chemistry and molecular pharmacology at Harvard Medical School. Her dissertation research there was supervised by the geneticist Jack W. Szostak, who would later receive the Nobel Prize in Medicine. Doudna's research concerned RNA (ribonucleic acid), a nucleic acid present in the cells of all living things. She focused specifically on ribozymes, molecules of RNA that catalyze biochemical reactions in proteins.
After receiving her doctorate in 1989, she continued her work with Dr. Szostak as a research fellow in molecular biology at Massachusetts General Hospital and in genetics at Harvard Medical School. In her research, Doudna had succeeded in altering the behavior of specific segments of RNA molecules, but further progress was thwarted by the mystery surrounding the actual molecular mechanism of the ribozyme.
Doudna's laboratory entered into a long-distance collaboration with Emmanuelle Charpentier, a French biochemist who was working in Sweden at the time. Together, they were investigating the function of Cas9, a protein found in the immune system of Streptococcus bacteria. The Streptococcus immune system functions through "clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats" (CRISPR), slicing through the DNA of hostile antibodies to disable them. Doudna, Charpentier, and their colleagues hypothesized that CRISPR-Cas9 could be deployed to edit the genome of living things, including human beings. In 2012, they demonstrated that RNA molecules could be programmed to cut and edit targeted DNA molecules.
Attempts to edit the genome had met with limited success in the past, but CRISPR technology offered the field of genetic science a swift and efficient technique with nearly limitless possibilities, not only for basic research but for the treatment and prevention of genetic disease. With her former student Rachel Haurwitz, Doudna has founded a company, Caribou Biosciences, that is now developing CRISPR technology to address issues such as antimicrobial resistance, food scarcity, and vaccine shortages.
Meanwhile, scientists around the world have applied CRISPR to cell biology and a broad spectrum of plant and animal research. Commercial food scientists are employing CRISPR technology to amplify flavors and to create disease-resistant produce. Medical scientists are pursuing treatments for sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, Huntington's disease and HIV. Other researchers have extracted blood cells from patients with cancer and blood diseases, edited the cells and returned them the patients with promising results. Editing of cells within the human body is now being tested to treat diseases of the eye and liver.
Because CRISPR technology is comparatively efficient and inexpensive, many see great danger in unregulated experimentation by unaccountable researchers. The United States Food and Drug Administration is prohibited from approving any studies that involve editing the human germline - eggs or sperm - and both China and the European Union are also attempting to block such research. Despite the Chinese ban, in 2019 one unaffiliated researcher in China reported tampering with the genes of a pair of twins in embryo and received criminal penalties including three years' imprisonment and a six-figure fine.
https://achievement.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/wp2-LondonSummit_0674.jpg
Jim is a choice form of James, as is Bob of Robert, Bill of William and Dick of Richard