Novavax, a new vaccine maker that got 1.5 billion from the U.S. government and another 400 million from Bill Gates, seems to be the answer for anyone who fears mRNA is programming your DNA. In addition, the EU is approving some drugs that should inhibit covid-19 symptoms. Good news right? Can we all sleep with peace of mind again.
Abolition of corona pass? No way.
There are even reports circulating in Telegram groups claiming that this will abolish the corona passport this October. For example, I received this email from a reader regarding this European Commission report and its mention in his Telegram group:
"I don't know if you read French, but as of Oct. 20, the Covid pass and vaccination will be abolished across the EU. A European Commission is making five effective drugs available and the vaccines would have been "experimental and provisional.""
Nonsense, of course. What it does say is the following:
"The EU treatment strategy for COVID-19 aims to build a broad portfolio of COVID-19 treatments with a target of three new treatments by October 2021 and possibly two more by the end of the year. It covers the entire drug life cycle, from research, development, screening of promising candidates, their rapid regulatory approval, manufacturing and implementation to end use."
There is no mention of the abolition of coronapas. In some countries, such as Portugal, you may be allowed back into restaurants from October without showing your corona ticket, but that seems to be nothing more than a well-timed election stunt. On September 26 there will be municipal elections and then you want to let go of the reins for a while; to then, of course, realize the subliminally predicted tsunami of sick and dead through 'sick on demand' (see here how that works with the vaccines and nose test).
Novavax
Novavax has built a vaccine that injects a synthetic version of the spike protein into people; which resembles the coronavirus. That spike protein in mRNA vaccines is produced by the cell itself, by means of a command to the cell given to it by the messenger RNA. That in itself should make it clear to people that a virus is a body's own reaction, producing a protein we call the coronavirus. That a virus cannot be infectious can be found thoroughly substantiated in this article series.
In the article 'The arguments for vaccinating and against vaccinating in a row' I explained it all in more detail and it is really important to delve into it. We now see that stigma and peer pressure in particular are supposed to win people over; where an argument like "who is the expert, the doctor or the influencer?" in particular is supposed to convince people. These influencers may even be given a bag of money to first play the anti-vaxxer and later withdraw the argument in order to win over millions of followers.
Novavax is not the way out for mRNA vaccine objectors, because the company has built a nano-tech synthetic virus that has been called spike protein. So with that (according to the official reading), instead of instructing the cell to make a protein, a synthetic version of the protein (one built via nanotechnology) is injected. By doing so, you immediately trigger the antibody reaction and thus make people sick as normally happens when the body recognizes external pollution and triggers a viral reaction (exsosome reaction - read "making a protein").
It is unprecedented in the history of the vaccine industry to inject humans with synthetically produced proteins and so here we have yet another experiment in which humans are the test animals and the long-term effect cannot be known because long-term tests have never been done. Yet in October the "research data" will be known and the EU is probably going to approve. Thank the cuckoo.
EU seeks approval of 10 potential COVID-19 treatments
Some candidates in the world of medication are currently being evaluated by the EU. A snippet from that EU document:
- Eli Lilly's immunosuppressant drug Baricitinib (a drug that reduces the activity of the immune system): an application for the extension of the marketing authorization with the indication for COVID-19 is pending 'investigation;
- The combination of Bamlanivimab and etesevimab by Eli Lilly: ongoing evaluation;
- the combination of Casirivimab and Imdevimab from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd: ongoing evaluation;
- Celltrion's Regdanvimab: ongoing evaluation;
- Sotrovimab from GlaxoSmithKline and Vir Biotechnology, Inc.: ongoing evaluation.
I hope you've already seen it, but point it out explicitly: "a drug that reduces the activity of the immune system." So first you put the body's own immune system on tilt by injecting a vaccine that turns on the immune response and then you cram in a drug that reduces that just turned on activity?
The names of the companies are also quite interesting. 'Regeneron,' for example. Look closely at the name. Do you recognize the word 'Regenerate' or 're-gen'? Something about rewriting your genes perhaps? Ah no, we don't want to see ghosts. Just trust and don't read the package insert. Vir Biotechnology? So biology will be called technology from now on? Yes that's basically what it comes down to. The technological approach to human biology has been deployed.
In the pharmaceutical industry, the abbreviation "mab" stands for a monoclonal antibody. Thus, it seems to focus on the production of 1 type of antibody. With that, it can be concluded that all the drugs mentioned focus on breaking down overproduction of antibodies; a plausible and expected response when you inject the body full of synthetic virus or inject mRNA that triggers this viral response (spike protein production).
Pretty understandable if we are going to see a tsunami of sickness and death as a result of "sick on demand" via the nasal test and vaccines; both of which can induce CRYSPR enzyme and graphene oxide, both short-lived and long-lived, respectively (see this commentary).
If you inject people with that crap that is meant to make antibodies (under the pretext that it offers protection against the supposedly infectious and mutating coronaviruses), then the body keeps making those antibodies and you are on the verge of being sick full-time. If you make too many antibodies things get out of control and you need a pill to slow it down. Sounds very healthy don't you think? The pharmaceutical industry makes you healthy. Box office!
Transhumanization of humanity
In 2019, I wrote a book writing about the use of vaccinations to make humanity programmable. Much more is now known about the contagion lie of the founder of the vaccination industry, Louis Pasteur. Pasteur cheated on his studies and even had to admit he was wrong about the theory of contagion.
On December 30, 2019, I predicted that 2020 would be the year when vaccination would be imposed. Unfortunately, this prediction came true. I also predicted the rise of mutations and repeat vaccinations. Why was I able to make these predictions? Well, because the master script is familiar to me, and if you know the end goal, you also understand the steps toward it. The end goal is the androgynous android man who will eventually fuse completely with AI (Artifcial Intelligence) in order to hijack the creative consciousness of man.
Watch this video and then actually read that book once. In 2012, I quit my job to start warning people about what was coming. Nobody could have imagined that it would all happen so quickly, but believe me when I say that the worst is yet to come. Therefore, be prepared and adopt the attitude of a true independent spirit that no longer accepts the false authority of governments. Please:
your bookThanks again for sharing (despite the blocked social media share counters below). There are more of us than you think (see also this vaccination rate poll). If you can spare a financial contribution, please support NL27 ABNA 0558 4469 22, Martin Vrijland Foundation to continue. Thanks in advance
Source link entries: observador.pt, flair.co.uk, globalresearch.ca, lilly.com, medicinenet.com, reuters.com
5 Comments
"Politicians are there to give you the illusion of choice" and in this case also the illusion of opposition.
As long as that opposition does not address the contamination lie, it remains well-nigh impossible and you do not take the sting out of the discussion.
You don't get infected; you get made sick: previous vaccines, spraying the air, hand gels, breathing in CO2 under a mouth mask and "sick on demand" (nasal test and vaccines combined with 5G).
Baudet should have spoken out adamantly from day 1 against the lockdown, against testing, against the mouthpiece and against vaccines. It's easy to stand in the pulpit when things are already fucked up, but at best it wins votes, but no action.
Boldly undermining and cracking down on sham democracy and renouncing your oath to the king; plus calling for direct democracy is the only right way(http://www.fvvd.nl)
Noteworthy fact is that in this speech I suddenly hear Baudet talking about direct democracy. He apparently reads along here because this is always a major criticism from my articles.
He says it all right, except for three things:
1. demand the resignation of the government (i.e. not by reigning through caretaker) followed by a direct democratic election and halt to the testing and vaccination agenda until a new directly democratically elected government is formed
2. state clearly that the contamination theory is proven to be based on lies
3. call citizens and businesses to an immediate strike and shut down the entire country until demand #1 is met
1. implies not only the resignation of the government, but also a constitutional revision in which the king must abdicate the throne. This also involves changing the form of state from a constitional monarchy to a Republic of the Netherlands Of, By and For the People.
https://www.kabinetvandekoning.nl/
Martin, how should we interpret the decision of the 2 top FDA officials with their signed article in THe Lancet?
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-meaning-of-the-fda-resignations/
Another propaganda piece dar help maintain the contagion lie. Sick in demand will soon give the neck shot to all those critics who helped maintain the contagion lie.