In my previous article I made two rather bold statements, namely 1thatthe principle of nuclear power plants is not about heat production as a result of nuclear fission for the benefit of steam production to drive a steam turbine, but is about electrolysis and 2thatthe radiation released in the process is not harmful. This has elicited quite a few reactions, so I would like to hear from you what you think.
First, it is important to have some basic knowledge of how substances are composed. This is laid down in the so-called periodic table of elements.
Every material is composed of both mass and charge. Some particles have no mass, but do have charge and are still defined as particles, even though they are not actually a tangible particle, but rather a vibration, such as an electron (no mass, but negative charge). The mass and positive charge, as it were, is in the nucleus, made up of protons and neutrons, and the negative charge is in the invisible electron ring.
I can imagine that you are not very fond of these kinds of chemical terms, but believe me: it is worth having a look at it and it also turns out to be quite fun and excellent to understand. It gives you basic knowledge of how electricity is generated and, after all, you are paying for it.
Let's see if we can back up my earlier statements and perform a "fact check" on what is written here.
1Arenuclear power plants based on steam turbines derived from the heat generated by nuclear fission?
The regular explanation of how nuclear power plants work is that nuclear fission creates heat in the water that surrounds the rods (in which nuclear fission takes place). That heat causes the water to boil, which simply creates steam, and that steam you can discharge to a steam turbine, which then turns and, like a dynamo on a bicycle wheel or in a car, generates electricity. That's not so hard to understand.
The video below shows the simplest explanation of how a nuclear fission-based nuclear power plant works. Most nuclear power plants we know are based on this principle of nuclear fission, although nuclear fusion plants are also being worked on, but this process is not yet viable for commercial application. It requires a lot of heat and the search for cold nuclear fusion is not yet complete.
The video below does not explain how nuclear fission works, but it does show how the process leads to steam and how Boron and Cadmium rods can be used to slow down nuclear fission. Take a look.
Interesting, but the big missing factor in this explanation is how the process gets started. The question that might come to mind now is possibly: Where does that first neutron come from that starts the whole process?
After all, the story is that neutrons split up and those released neutrons collide with other cell nuclei to then split up again, releasing neutrons. However, somewhere that first neutron must come from that starts that whole process of collision and fission. What you would also want to know is why Boron and Cadmium then stop that process again.
The explanation for creating the first startup neutron can hardly be found online. The video below (which you should study carefully, because again it is funny how, again, not everything is told there) states that this is done by a particle accelerator, but what is that and how does it work? Let's see (and read on below):
So the story is that a neutron is released when deuterium collides with tritium. To achieve that collision, you must first make the deuterium molecule rid itself of its electron. This, according to the video, is done by bumping the electron away from the electron ring of the molecule. What it says there is: electrolysis. The electron is not bumped away, it is pulled out of the electron ring by a strong difference between anode (the minus pole of a battery) and cathode (the plus pole of a battery).
"Well, those are already too many difficult terms for me Vrijland!" No ya, you just have to be patient. The point is to understand where the first neutron comes from; that first neutron that realizes the nuclear fission in the material that causes the fission chain reaction in the nuclear reactor. So we now know that. Whether it is correct we cannot check.
The assumption is that by dropping the electron from the deuterium molecule, it gains a positive charge (which could theoretically be possible) and that this positive charge in the electromagnetic field provides the propulsion for the molecule so as to cause it to collide with the tritium molecule and thus a neutron is bumped out of that tritium; just like in a bumper car at the fair, if you collide too hard with another car and the driver flies out of the car.
In practice, it looks more like a light bulb being pointed at the uranium rods. Whether the images below are real or a CGI animation we don't know, but it looks like the first neutron is shot off in a flash of light. How it can travel the last meter in a straight line; Who knows, but it looks flashy (and read on below).
By the way, it seems those nuclear power plants are not that dangerous at all. Check out how you can take a tour at MIT and it all looks like you enter a bakery where you have to put on a dust jacket for a while. Are you also starting to question nuclear power more and more? (continue reading below the video)
The thesis was that we wanted to explore whether nuclear power plants are purely steam generators or whether they involve an electrolysis process. The steam power plant explanation can be found above. To find out if instead of steam-electro generation, there is actually electrolysis, you first need to know what electrolysis is. It was briefly mentioned above, so let's take a look.
Water,H2Oconsists of: 2 atoms of H+ and 1 atom of O2-. That is, the oxygen atom that makes up water (together with two hydrogen atoms) has a negative charge of 2 electrons and the hydrogen atoms each have a positive charge. The three atoms are connected by sharing their electron ring and thus 2x a plus charge (hydrogen) and 1x a -2 charge eventually becomes neutral and the water molecule remains connected by electromagnetic attraction: H+ + H+ + O2- = H2O.
Electrolysis is the process by which you run a stream of electrons (via battery with a plus and minus pole) through the water, breaking that electromagnetic balance of the water molecule. That means that the two H+ atoms, which would normally need the two electrons from oxygen to form a whole to formH2O, now pick up an electron from the electron flow through the water. This allows the two H+ atoms to bond together by borrowing 2 electrons from the current. And so hydrogen gasH2 forms at the minus pole (the anode).
Oxygen actually has to lose two electrons because two negatively charged O2 atoms repel each other. Those electrons are given off by the oxygen atom to the plus pole of the battery (the cathode) and so two oxygen atoms can bond to form O2 (pure oxygen gas).
If you want a detailed explanation, check out the video below (and read on below).
Combustion of that oxygen and hydrogen gas you can actually use to turn a turbine to generate electricity through a dynamo. The only thing that then comes out of the exhaust of that turbine is water vapor (H2O).
Now we come to the question of whether nuclear power plants might be covert electrolysis plants. To understand that, it is useful to understand the nuclear fission principle. Of course, we also and especially need to know how that nuclear fission is then started, but you have seen that explanation above.
Important in all of this is that what we call radiation is actually the exchange of mass and charge, as explained in this video. Now I don't want to post too many videos here, but the basic understanding is very important for those who want to dig a little deeper.
Thus, if nuclear fission occurs, as it does according to the official reading, a uranium cell nucleus is split into two new cell nuclei, which would release 3 neutrons.
Uranium 236 contains 92 protons, 144 neutrons and 92 electrons. It is a little difficult to tell whether protons and neutrons actually exist, because it cannot be seen under a microscope. Neutrons are believed to have a neutral charge and a mass just slightly larger than protons. Protons have a positive charge; which together with the negative charge of the (massless) electrons holds things together.
If you fire 1 neutron at a Uranium 236 molecule, it splits into Krypton and Barium, releasing 3 neutrons that in turn target new Uranium 236 molecules for the same process.
Krypton has 92 neutrons and 36 protons. Barium has 141 neutrons and 56 protons. If you add up the number of protons of Krypton and Barium, you arrive at (36+56) 92. If you add up the number of neutrons of both, you come to (92+141) 233 neutrons. That's 3 fewer than the original uranium molecule had. The number of electrons always equals the number of neutrons, so no electrons are released in this reaction; only neutrons (watch and read more below the video).
So we would have to conclude that a fact check, based on generally accepted theories, applied to my own article from yesterday, should lead to the conclusion that it is not electrolysis that generates power in a nuclear power plant, but rather it is the heat released by the nuclear reaction process; the heat that brings the water to steam and turns the turbine.
Mind you, all this is based on the assumption that a cell nucleus of a molecule actually consists of protons and neutrons. Not to mention the particles that make up those protons and neutrons. The term "quarks" has been added to that today. All this is also based on the idea that neutrons have no charge.
And so all this is based mostly on mathematical models that assume something we cannot actually observe: protons and neutrons. The rest takes place in large concrete structures; inaccessible to anyone who does not work in the industry.
2Isthe radiation released in the nuclear fission process harmful?
That second "fact check" challenge I wanted to lay before you. I showed you the images of Galen Winsor, a well-known nuclear physicist who worked on and helped design nuclear power plants. I show them to you again here and ask you what you think: Should we relegate this to the land of fables even with the official theoretical explanations or is it just the truth after all?
What about nuclear weapons or nukes?
And while we are "fact checking," I would also like to hear your reaction to the existence or non-existence of nuclear and atomic weapons. What do you think after watching the video below? Do you have any other contributions that could make "fact checking" even more meaningful? Let us know in the comments!
Link entries: britannica.com
15 Comments
From reliable sources (e.g. Shell), not too much of the Rutherford model is correct.
2 youtube videos of Galen Winsor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMJO6dVTdP0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VvGw1tkT1Q
An extensive article by Anders Bjorkman
https://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm
by Miles Mathis
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
http://mileswmathis.com/bikini.pdf
I sent Mr. Mathis an email and asked what he thinks of the whole virus isolation story. Should be a piece of cake for him to see that they have never done that. Never had a response. I've never read anything about that on his site either, although I must confess I haven't followed him since then (Oct 21). So maybe he has since come around.
Here is the link to the piece I sent Miles Mathis.
https://off-guardian.org/2022/09/26/this-week-in-the-new-normal-47/#comment-545205
Ludcor thanks for the links posted......at 1 hr 05 min in the first link of the interview with Galen Windsor you will find the pivot point that everything is about in the modern world; free and cheap and clean energy everywhere in the world. If this starts to be known and applied "Mr. Global" (whoever this may be) will have lost his whip.
The mere fact that Hiroshima is a bustling city again a dozen years later tells me enough. Besides, the pictures of that devastated city looked almost the same as the pictures of bombed Berlin.
Of course, the fact that nuclear weapons were never deployed after WW2, with all those "deranged leaders," is also a miracle in itself... My conclusion: the story just doesn't add up!
just as we have never been back on the moon must also be questionable
To the moon I have devoted an entire book/essay: Freedom Can Begin Today.
Exactly freefighter, there is also very much material available that firebombs were thrown then but that wisdom is being
blocked from all sides.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VcENA2k7CUqE/
It has already been posted to an article, but the flora and fauna are not much affected by the radiation.
https://youtu.be/XaUNhqnpiOE
It is of course very convenient to have such an invisible radiation on hand to fool or restrain masses.
Soon everyone in line for an iodine shot bovol graphene 🙂 - and preferably daily.
So, the movie "The French Connection" (with Gene Hackman) is also bogus because of the scene where someone ingests radioactive material and starts shedding black sweat etc.?
And what about the Radium Girls? We should be able to debunk all of this fear inducing propaganda so we can understand better why using radioactive material was regarded acceptable in the time of Tartaria and other lost civilizations.
I neither can recall historical evidence from ancient times about digging up radioactive material from caves and people dying from it and becoming scared because of the doom and curse etc.
Spreading fear through so-called nuclear weapons, nothing is real...?
Relatives by marriage visited Japan two years ago. This aunt also wanted to show respect and compassion to Hiroshima
because of the destruction, radiation , nuclear winter: all dead for at least a hundred years.
To her amazement, ....nothing was to be seen of the supposedly terrible atomic attack.
Nothing.
The visitor was stunned.
She arrived in Hiroshima in an upscale, modern city of 1.2 million affluent residents.
No visible generational birth defects. No ruins, no traces, no statues groups....
Nothing.
Hiroshima has been under construction since the late 1940s/ 1950s. .(Maw..started immediately after the attack.)
(What?)
This world famous place is a major seaport city with busy shipping traffic, airport and high-speed trains,
excellent infrastructure. Subways. Modern residential blocks. Lots of greenery. Parks and shopping centers.
Waterfront promenades, beaches. Nice ....if you like hyper modern mega cities.
Memorial sites (1 or 2) were small and hard to find.
(Probably the older inhabitants of this city (and Nagasaki and the rest of Japan) know the real history.
And are - still - under heavy censorship).
According to a US war veteran (I think on yt. in an interview from 1970s), the nuclear attack was indeed staged.
Trick of the Americans.
This soldier was stationed in Japan August 1945. WW2 was effectively over.
So the American military was everywhere in Japan.
Especially in the port cities.
Veteran: "The US Army detonated a Navy freighter full of TNT in Hiroshima harbor.
This explosion gave the huge blast and air pressure thump that left part of the population stunned, blind and deaf, temporarily.'
At the same time.....following the same veteran....the city was bombed by planes with phosphorus bombs and napalm.
(like later Viet Nam, Cambodia, Laos).
The little footage ( mushroom cloud etc) was produced by US/ PTB military propaganda.
There was no TV, there were primitive newspapers with blurred pictures. And all the photographers and studios knew what photoshopping was.
Plus the world population was severely traumatized by two deranged world wars and prolonged financial crises.
Famines and other hardships. In emptied Holland, polders had to be drained. Cities built up.
Shoveling mud. removing cadavers etc.
A US docu WW2...recently casually reported....'that the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were strictly forbidden to talk, write or otherwise report (!!!) about the alleged atomic blast , the bombing and firebombing. And about the type of wounded.
(Probably all of Japan was under very strict censorship from summer 1945).
Total silence under penalty of at least three years in prison.'....
Oops.
The American/English/Allied 'press' was everywhere from summer 1945 .
This military propaganda service 'looked after' the 'news' for at least a decade . Within Japan. And worldwide .
And they still do.
Our innocent little frog country is also under receivership .....since the Marshall Plan.
Namasté...Chandra.
Pearl Harbor was also completely staged. Empty ships had been left by the Americans to be supposedly bombed by the Japanese and now America had her motive to join in the "second world war."
Other fun fact is that Churchill's predecessor, I think his name was Chamberlain, wanted to talk to Hitler about peace talks. Until he was poisoned and Churchill was put forward to replace him. Churchill, of course, immediately declared war. Churchill, who came from a very rich background and already had a lot of death and destruction to his name in the English colonies.
History is certainly not as they show us in the history books and sensational movies, but is the image that has stuck with 99% of the population.
There we go 😂
From US Federal Health and Human Services:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 4, 2022
Contact HHS Press Office
202-821-9446
[email protected]
http://www.hhs.gov/news
Twitter: @HHSgov
HHS purchases drug for use in radiological and nuclear emergencies
As part of long-standing, ongoing efforts to be better prepared to save lives following radiological and nuclear emergencies, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is purchasing a supply of the drug Nplate from Amgen USA Inc; Nplate is approved to treat blood cell injuries that accompany acute radiation syndrome in adult and pediatric patients (ARS).
Amgen, based in Thousands Oaks, California, developed Nplate for ARS with support from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the HHS Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), as well as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health.
BARDA is using its authority provided under the 2004 Project Bioshield Act and $290 million in Project BioShield designated funding to purchase this supply of the drug. Amgen will maintain this supply in vendor-managed inventory. This approach decreases life-cycle management costs for taxpayers because doses that are near expiration can be rotated into the commercial market for rapid use prior to expiration and new doses can be added to the government supply.