The deepfake 'ghost family' PsyOp for taking away all your liberties and introduction 'thought police' (part 2)

Filed in NEWS ANALYZES by on 21 October 2019 10 Comments


It is admirable how the PsyOp machine has used all possible means to put together this beautiful 'ghost family Ruinerwold' real-fake life soap. It is a great film script, in which even a blog and videos are put together. Of course that is a "paranoid conspiracy idea", because the state does not do such a thing and John de Mol with his film studios as owner of the ANP would of course never do that at all. He really does earn his billions in a decent way and does not need a state spot for that.

De beautiful movies from the 'ghost father' Gerrit Jan van Dorsten (aka John Eagle) from the 'ghost family' have been peered, because otherwise you think it could be a deepfake. For example, you can read the exciting script in this Volkskrant article or here No style. De Telegraaf, as the largest promoter of this PsyOp, pushes readers to become a premium member. You can work around this by opening an article in Incognito Mode (Google Chrome). Then you can tell the beautiful boys' book (if this) still read for free.

A great storyline has been devised that will drag you along in a sort of Dan Brown-like quest. We Dutch find this fantastic. We enjoy this. If it is not true, it is still an exciting story. But why would such a thing not be true? Then why do the media put all that effort into it? Well there are some double bottoms in this PsyOp. PsyOp (abbreviation for: psychological operation) is used as a state in cooperation with your media to convince the people of new legislation that it would normally never accept. For this you must first play them psychologically. So you invent a problem and you inflate that problem to large proportions in the media. You then elicit outrage among the people through the same media. On social media, your troll army is ready to immediately dismiss anyone who is critical. Then you have the masses ready for the solution that you have wanted to introduce all along. "Problem, Reaction, Solutionis called this psychological game.

The solution on the shelf in this soap opera was actually clear from the first day: The state wants to be able to look behind every front door. Where you still need a search warrant from a public prosecutor, that threshold should preferably be removed. For that you have to create a problem in the media that makes everyone think “Yes, no, that really is no longer possible. Something really has to be done about it!The father (with that beautiful soap opera nickname John Eagle) also had his own religion and kept his children out of the regular education system. You can already see it: you immediately deal with people who want to do home education. "The reason for this home education would have been that the 'home school' where Gerrit Jan brought his children, suddenly followed the rules of the state.", The media report us in this soap series. In short: if you do not agree with the state's educational principles in the future, you are linked to this eccentric, nicknamed John Eagle, and you are regarded as someone who separates your children from the outside world.

So at primary school your child is told that it is not a boy or girl, but that he or she can still choose his or her gender and can be converted, and if you do not really like it and you take your children out of school, then you from now on a 'ghost parent'.

There are so many double bottoms in this PsyOp. Fantastic! Purify your own water and your own vegetable garden? Then you are an odd person like John Eagle. Do you like wood and do you make your own stuff? Then you are an odd person like John Eagle. Do you have a weblog and do you write about spiritual matters? Then you are an odd person like John Eagle. That John Eagle blog is of course just as fake as his videos. Beautiful acting; great script writers! Have you ever watched a movie and completely lost yourself in the movie and felt that it had happened? That is now happening. The film studios of John de Mol have every means to create a film. Who tells you that fact and fiction are not mixed when John de Mol has all the technical means to put this soap together? "Yes, but they all have witnesses who knew the man or the family". Yes, just like in the movies. You really have to go into the deepfakes principle. You can make people appear lifelike and 'real' in movies, interviews, in a history, in a whole social media history, image, sound, young, old and so on.

I have often discussed the techniques with which deepfake characters can be created. I would like to repeat that here for the new readers. Because if you follow the news daily, it is extremely important that you take note of this subject, because you will see what techniques are available to easily play the people. Very easy.

Deepfakes are made through GAN (Generative Adversarial Networks)) software techniques. This is artificial intelligent software that, based on multiple AI systems in a network, creates characters out of nothing. AI is English for Artificial Intelligence; what stands for artificial intelligence. Another AI network then tests the images created by the first network and rejects or approves them. By doing this in a cycle, the characters become more realistic with each step, so that you can ultimately generate completely fictional people who look like ordinary everyday people (whom you might just meet on the street). If you want to know exactly how this works, first watch the video below from NVIDIA (the well-known graphics card manufacturer for PCs).

It is not only useful to know that this deepfake technique exists, but also how a deepfake character can be used in, for example, videos or to generate social media profiles (including an entire history; including photos and videos and likes from others) deepfake social media profiles). For example, social media discussions can easily be monitored online by "home workers" or employees of a telemarketing agency, for example, where the characters with whom you are discussing may hide behind such a deepfake profile (whose friends network is also filled with deepfake profiles). They can attack people on their timeline in discussions in order to steer sentiment among the people in a certain direction.

Let us look at all application possibilities, but before we start, it is useful to know that the game and film industry, but also TV producers, have had such techniques for a long time. However, the work is now simplified to such an extent that you can do it yourself on a home-garden-and-kitchen PC.

When Paul Walker died in the middle of the Fast and Furious 7 recording, the Weta Digital company was called in to complete the film version of Paul Walker. Based on a combination of methods such as old images, body scans of Paul's brothers and digitization of Paul's head, Weta Digital brought Paul Walker back to life. The video below provides a summary of how this worked.

The 3D motion capture technique has existed for years in which actors wear suits to record their movements and then superimpose characters created digitally via CGI. That is comparable to the technique used for Paul Walker, only with live actors wearing a motion capture suit. That technique is now also available for people with a low budget (see video below), but a good example of a film in which this technique has already been used is the movie Avatar from 2009 (see here).

NVIDIA has already caught up with the use of these suits and CGI technology, because it uses neural networks to train the software. In fact, this is the same technique behind the deepfake faces. NVIDIA is now not only able to generate non-existent faces, but can drive through a city with a camera and turn it into a winter landscape (in real time). Such techniques can for example be used to train the AI ​​software of self-driving cars in changing weather conditions, but they can also be used to make a motion capture suit unnecessary. A simple GoPro camera or webcam is enough. Take a look from 1: 03 min. In the video below to see how that works.

Now you may think that the possibility to do this in real time does not exist. Think again. We have already seen above that it is possible to create non-existent persons via Generative Adversarial Networks. We now know that both an urban environment and a character can be generated via neural networks. The question is whether that is also possible in real time. That's where the technology of real-time facial reenactment comes in. This has been around for a simple home PC since the year 2015 (see video below).

All in all, we can therefore state that it has been possible for years to generate deep-fake videos. However, the technology has now become so simplified with the emergence of Generative Adversarial Networks, neural networks and real-time facial reenactment, that you can actually create an entire history of a non-existent person in a matter of minutes, a live interview of that non-existent person can create any environment from any cameras perspective and any weather condition.

What are the implications of this? To start with, you can say that you have not been able to trust 100% for years. View here how long CGI techniques have been used in the film industry. However, at the moment it is so simple that anyone with a budget of a few thousand euros can already do this. If we assume that the media is fair, then we can assume that they have not been using such techniques for years. However, if we take into account the possibility that governments use psychological operations to psychologically bring the people into the acceptance mode of new and stricter legislation, then we must realize that for years technically there has been nothing standing in the way of producing fake news. In that context it is very interesting to know that the country's largest news agency (the Algemeen Nederlands Persbureau; abbreviated ANP) is in the hands of a TV producer (who is also a billionaire). How big must we be to be sure that these techniques have not been used for years?

It seems that the media are eagerly looking to close the leak that Martin Vrijland has hit in the bottom of the big mainstream media ship. For several years now, I have been explaining how media can manipulate images. Jort Kelder and Alexander Klöpping were therefore allowed in the Kelder & Klöpping TV program show what deepfakes are. Also the radio program Image determiners BNR Nieuwsradio (perception managers) recently mentioned what I have been writing about for so long. It is clear that the panic is always noticeable and that the program makers must try to keep the viewer and listener on board. You must continue to trust in the media and in democracy, because there is nothing worse than the mob revolting (to speak in the words of Jort basement).

Of course the "solution" for all this is that governments and tech companies are going to try to add a kind of watermark to movies, so that they can be checked for authenticity. The only question is that if governments themselves have been using fake news for years to push through legislation and play on the people whether or not that watermark is so reliable. Is a butcher going to reject his own meat? No of course not. All the news from John de Mol, NOS, De Telegraaf and so on has always been completely reliable and honest! Cough. Do you really think that John de Mol will appear on TV today or tomorrow to say: “Sorry ladies and gentlemen, I have made fake news with all the TV studios and software that I have at my disposal. I have presented you with fake news and played with psychological operations at the cost of the tax pot and filled my bags"? No of course not. And of course you have to keep faith in the media and in the government, because who else do you have to trust? read here...

Possible deepfake applications:

  1. deepfake social media profiles
  2. photos and videos from the past including family and friends
  3. live interview with a non-existent person
  4. images from security cameras
  5. video as evidence in the news (fake news productions)
  6. and so on

We can therefore say with certainty that from a technical point of view there is nothing to prevent a 'ghost family' from PsyOp. That is only a matter of a few months of preparation. Of course you will still be able to think:Yes, but that building in Zwartsluis was really a toy store?"Have you ever been to Zwartsluis? Do you think there is a rooster that even craves that?

The state will probably also use this PsyOp to draw up a kind of guideline for 'deviating ideas'. This makes the George Orwell 1984 thought police as good as a fact. The people are just as clamped as the legs of Peter R. de Vries on a Transavia flight. Read it here continued in part 3.

Source link listings:,,,,,


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author ()

Comments (10)

trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Martin Vrijland wrote:

    If something is clearly Fake ... you always have the state scrolls that guard the responses:

  2. SalmonInClick wrote:

    What I have been warning about for decades in my immediate environment now threatens to come true. All those killers "Oh, it won't go that fast.", "The state is here to protect us.", "We are in the majority and they are not."
    Following on from the latter, I pre-sorted out and emigrated because I had come to the conclusion that the average Neanderlander is not exactly awake and therefore there could not have been a 'majority' in Madurodam.

    It must apparently come to the point that the police can kick in doors at the direction of a local NSB employee. Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter and your children can take away without having to justify themselves. And with all the technology available, it is a breeze to scan your house remotely and to remove all obstacles.

    And so it can be that a minority can continue to watch over a mass of sheep ... Watchful and Servant. Madurodam, it all looks calm and friendly but there is a treacherous undercurrent ...

    “Aufmachen zum Verhör”

  3. Martin Vrijland wrote:

    Another confused person who could have been deported into the psychulance if family or neighbors could have warned the police and the Edith Schippers legislation was regulated, so that anyone who is slightly different could have been locked up for observation.

    We bet that it was someone who supported conspiracies?

  4. SandinG wrote:

    it is of course not the intention that you as a family stay under the radar in madurodam. As befits a good civilian slave you have to stay on the radar and pay as many taxes as possible and always be at the disposal of and for the sake of that slaveholder.

    How could the family from Ruinerwold stay under the radar for so long?

  5. Shoe Lace wrote:

    Strong article again Martin! Top written.

Leave a Reply

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow cookies' to give you the best browsing experience possible.If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click on "Accept" below then you agree with these institutions.