Do the media work with script writers and do they sell PsyOp operations as they do with TV shows?

Filed in NEWS ANALYZES by on 15 May 2019 11 Comments

source: ageofshitlords.com

Anyone who has followed the Anne Faber case and has recently seen the Julie van Espen case in Belgium in the news must have noticed that there was more or less a similar situation. If we follow the media, this news is simply the truth. We are inundated with images that confirm the authenticity and we not only see family and friends, but we also see real photos and videos of the main characters, which means that it really cannot be other than the truth. In the article below, I try to explain why you may still have to scratch your head.

First a short introduction.

Troll armies

We have heard of the 'troll factory' or 'troll army' phenomenon, but they are only in Russia (the media tells us). However, my experience is that those troll armies are mainly in the Netherlands. You no longer see that so well in my responses, because I filter them away using a self-set word filter. Let's say that when governments work with PsyOp (psychological operation) scripts and sell these successful 'across the border' (because it scored well in their own country), you need a large troll army to get responses in all kinds of forums and online discussions on social media “to monitor”. They can send the discussion through comments such as "I knew her" or "she was with a friend of mine at the office" and many other comments.

People usually do not check which Facebook profile is behind a response. They don't always have to be fake profiles; that can also be real existing people.

You may have heard of the term Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter. Under the Stasi of the East German GDR, those were the quiet, secret workers who, for example, kept an eye on their neighbors. That was reportedly one in fifty at the time. You may believe that this phenomenon disappeared from the face of the earth after the integration of East with West Germany. I'm not so sure about that. I do not rule out - in view of my experience with all the responses over the years - that the Netherlands has a large troll army ready to steer the social media discussions in favor of a possible script.

Director work

Did you know that John de Mol owns the ANP? Do you know how John de Mol became rich? Largely through the sale of successful TV shows. You know them from those shows like Holland's Got Talent. They are then tested on those few million Dutch people and if they catch on, they are sold across the border as a concept and well earned. At the time of the Zaanse vloggersrel, I was able to visualize (thanks to the supplied images of a friend who lived in the neighborhood) how Powned was hard at work directing a completely staged vloggersrel. It became clear that there was directing. It was also clear that, for example, an arrest took a very long time, because the cameraman had to walk to the right position. Shortly before, the gentlemen who were arguing in front of the camera were jokingly laughing and taking selfies with each other. That Zaanse vloggersrel was completely staged and was directed live. Those images you can here see back.

Deepfakes

I have frequently discussed the techniques with which deepfake characters can be created. I would like to repeat that for the new readers. Deepfakes are made through GAN software. This is artificial intelligent software that, based on multiple AI systems in a network, creates characters out of nothing. AI is English for Artificial Intelligence; what stands for artificial intelligence. Another AI network then tests the images created by the first network and rejects or approves them. By doing this in a cycle, the characters become more realistic with each step, so that you can eventually generate completely fictional people who look like ordinary people (who you might just meet on the street). For years the film industry has been able to create non-existing characters, graphic card developer NVIDIA has ensured that you can now also do this on a reasonable game PC (see here). The same company (NVIDIA) is capable of creating virtual environments. Take a look at the video below and then continue reading.

Now there is also software on the market with which you can give a live interview from behind a webcam on a regular PC and put both the face and the voice of another about it. This is done in real time and without any interruptions. You can see this below (read further under the video).

If you add all these available resources together, you can therefore create any person you want, and you can also create a history of it and make it all seem like it is lifelike. Hypothetically, for example, you could produce a video of Anne Faber from a few years ago, with her father in the car, and make everyone believe that this is real. Or is that perhaps not hypothetical, but is that simply what happens in practice? Can you check it? We can be confident that governments and the media are not producing fake news and we can believe that secret services are developing techniques to detect deepfakes, but are they not simply the producers of such deepfakes themselves?

John de Mol

So if John de Mol, billionaire, largest TV producer and owner of the ANP (General Dutch Press Agency) is likely to have all the means and should therefore be deemed capable of generating deepfakes, then we should laugh away when someone stands up you point out that there is a possibility that we might be fooled? I have, moreover, shown it several times (because I did not show at demonstrations supported with visual material we were cheated). Could it be that it is so bad that such a script, just like a big TV show, is sold abroad, because it has proven to be successful?

Why should they?

"Yes, but Vrijland, must there be a goal to fool the people on such a large scale? Who does such a thing !?"Then you should pay attention to what new laws are being implemented, shortly after such a major event as the Anne Faber case. In several articles I described why the Anne Faber case (in which Michael P. was the perpetrator) was most likely a PsyOp (psychological operation). An operation to push through more legislation. Legislation that the people would never just embrace under normal circumstances. For this, something must have happened radically.

Problem, Reaction, Solution

Let me start by explaining again how the media can play this PsyOp game and what the Problem, Reaction, Solution maxim is that it seems to be applied time and time again and then to see what we see of this in the Julie van Espen and Steve B. case.

What is that maxim then Problem, Reaction, Solution? What you as a government then do is: You create a social problem with great impact (Problems) provokes a fierce emotional reaction among the people (Reaction) and can implement new laws and measures that would normally never be accepted (Solution). You then package that in words such as “The government has failed in the protection that society can expect from it", As recently came from the Dutch minister Sander Dekker.

You can therefore work with the techniques described above to create such a problem. In fact, it means that you cannot test any interview, speech or any image whatsoever for truth. So you can't really believe your eyes anymore. Television and other media are technically able to breathe life into non-existent characters. Even if you think it was recorded with a telephone and whether it comes from a security camera, you cannot be sure that it is authentic. Everything is possible and nothing is impossible in the world of the media. You must always pay attention to which Solution follows shortly after such a major event.

Question marks at Anne Faber case

"But Vrijland, the murder of Anne Faber could just as well have really happened?"Yes, you can, only in the series of articles that I wrote about that (see here) It has become clear that it has turned out to be a very unlikely story. Which young woman gets on a bicycle to start with a storm predicted and then starts cycling an ANWB route and why was her coat found on 3 October and did it take 6 days for a DNA match with Michael Panhuis to be realized? That is simply not correct. The NFI can do that to do in 6 hours. Why did Michael spread all found objects around and what about his being? scooter ride with Anne Faber behind? Why was she first buried and then cremated and then again to be buried? Why were forensic and autopsy report not shown in the court case? Oh well, and there have been many more oddities in this case, but mainly because you have seen the images of emotional parents, you have come to believe in it. The exciting storyline plus treasure hunt (Problems) emotionally affected the people enormously and so it became in the Reaction in order to embrace the new legislation (Solution). This can now be done by your child or happen to yourself too:

Dekker calls it 'very undesirable' that suspects who need treatment in TBS that can escape by not cooperating with investigations and that this can no longer happen.

In addition, a structured risk assessment and a crime analysis are made mandatory. Societal risks when granting freedoms to detainees become more important.

In short: research into the psychological state becomes mandatory and then we think of Michael Panhuis and so we are convinced of the necessity. The fact that for many citizens this may mean that they will be placed at the disposal of the state for life (and thus lose all human rights), after having undergone a mandatory examination, means that anyone who wants to psychiatically write off can be referred to. So more police state.

Emotional play

The case of Anne Faber and Michael P. therefore stinks like an hour in the wind and it seems strongly that the story has been staged on a large scale with the cooperation of the judiciary, media and politicians to simply push through new legislation that would never be accepted by the people. By playing the people heavily on the emotion, the masses are convinced to be in favor of such a change of law, because everyone links it to the monster Michael P.

The media has convinced us that it would all be true, but we will never be able to check it ourselves and we must assume that we are not playing with Hollywood techniques. The result is that people can be put away psychiatrically without reason and can disappear into their guilt all their lives, because the legislation no longer protects them.

And what about Julie van Espen and Steve B.?

What immediately stood out in Steve B.'s description was the following text vrt.be:

According to our information, the images would have been photoshopped in the interest of the investigation before they were distributed as an investigation report (see photo below, left the photo-shoped image - right the original camera image). The police would immediately have known that he was not just "a witness".

Why would the police have "shopped away the basket that Steve B. was carrying" in the interest of the investigation? You could say that they did so in order not to demotivate any witnesses, but you could also say that they already knew that Steve B. could be linked to Julie's missing because he was walking around with her basket . You could also say: here we see the living proof of how easily images can be manipulated and we also see here the proof that this is happening.

source: vrt.be

What was even more striking was that it was not the father of the victim who spoke, but the stepfather. In the Anne Faber case we saw an uncle who was the first to speak. Only later did the parents start appearing. I keep pointing out the option of deepfakes and actors, where images can be manipulated live and a new face can easily be placed in an interview (including voice overlay). The social media troll army that is ready to say “it was a friend of or knowledge of .."Convinces the masses to dispel the last doubt.

The "Solution"

In the search for Julie, a large-scale call was also made for a citizen search. This is presumably to make the social impact great and to focus all the attention of the people on the matter. Of course this offender also appears to have a rape past and so you can take it for granted that we are here again Problem, Reaction, Solution see action, with new legislation (also in Belgium) that everyone can hold for longer or impose psychiatric treatment (whether the psychiatrist considers this necessary or not). The Default.be reports:

"The court sentenced the defendant to a four-year prison sentence for rape and theft." That's how it sounded almost two years ago, on 30 June 2017, at the Antwerp Court. Yet Steve B. did not go to jail that day. The public prosecutor asked for his immediate arrest, but the court did not respond to this.

B. also appealed his conviction. As a result, she was not final and he remained free until a judgment was appealed.

An aunt testifies that, thanks to her, he was released under certain conditions. "His psychiatrist had come to talk to me," says the woman, who wants to remain anonymous. "He didn't see Steve as a criminal. That boy just needs help, he thought. And if we could give him that? We did that. "

In this you can actually alreadySolution' read. Probably after this case the people will be convinced of the end of release when filing an appeal and the judge (not more, but only 1) must judge whether or not someone should be locked up in a clinic. That such legislation can then affect everyone is flooded by the tidal wave of emotion with which the masses in such a (suspected) PsyOp case are played.

Answer the question in the title

To the question from the title “Do the media work with script writers and do they sell PsyOp operations like this happens with a TV show?“, The answer could therefore simply be YES. Of course there are quite a few people with butter on their heads, but in return those people have a wonderful salary or can call themselves a billionaire and enjoy all the luxury they want. You do not know; you can't check it; you can't get your finger on it until somebody ever stands up and exposes everything from the inside. However, the chance that this will happen is small, because the participants are probably blackmailable. Moreover, all sub-areas of a Psychological Operation are probably so compartmentalised that many do not know that they are part of a PsyOp script.

115 Shares

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author ()

Comments (11)

trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. John.S wrote:

    The RtvUtrecht website has recently been publishing PsyOp news. They are hard at it and try to lead the readers astray.

  2. danny wrote:

    Really good article again.
    The last sentence in particular is also very important.
    What often comes up here on this site is a video of a hypnotist who makes people believe that a sour lemon tastes like a sweet mango or something similar.
    The hypnotist of course knows that that is not true, but the hypnotist will really believe that he is eating a sweet mango and will continue to claim that he is eating a sweet mango because he really believes that

    For the system, these are "useful idiots" that can be used.

    So you have the hypnotists and the hypnotized or a combination of the two.

  3. Wilfred Bakker wrote:

    Nice to read that you will stay for a while, things are going so fast now that a clear view of the coming things that await us is desperately needed.
    Not entirely of topic this is a must, that boy plays with they live on his channel, a guts so to speak.

    Israel Hacking the World, you just have to dare.

    https://youtu.be/5VGpWl56ZF0

    Love

  4. Karel Reuterz wrote:

    Yes, I certainly believe so. The ruthless parasites of power do not shy away from anything.
    War scripts are written, books are deliberately twisted and made up (documentary attached)
    How easy is it then? to write scripts for important laws in favor of power. The group is increasing in large numbers, who dismiss Faber's fable stories as fake news.

    minute 1-12.47 in this super docu >>>>>>>>>>
    Now adays we have been in the middle east and even though the events go on right now, the exchange
    of information is now more easier and efficient with the help of various technical gadgets and yet people
    in different parts of the world have radicaly different information about who is fighting who ??? ………. who are the parties involved? …………… ..

    So, if it's possible to fool people about events which are happening in front of their eyes, how much easier would it be to fool them about things 100 thirds of years ago.

  5. Why do you want to know this? wrote:

    Funny that the piece about deep fake movies is shown with Putin. Here is another one, but from the mainstream media:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2019/vladimir-putin

    Are people slowly getting ready for manipulated television?

  6. Camera 2 wrote:

    Beautiful date 9-11 Journaal Nederland

    Nine eleven, probably also a masterly pSY-OPP? That Heineken kidnapping, nice script

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LredfCXGw6k

    and now the pleps can ask questions about the actor Holleeder in het Parool, beautiful

    https://www.parool.nl/amsterdam/wat-wil-jij-nog-weten-over-het-holleederproces-stel-je-vragen~b0c45faf/

Leave a Reply

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow cookies' to give you the best browsing experience possible.If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click on "Accept" below then you agree with these institutions.

close