It remains a remarkable story this parallel murder of Romy and Savannah. Of course, we hear almost nothing more about Romy's murder. After all, that one has been "solved." The perpetrator has confessed. A 14-year-old boy abused and murdered Romy. How he performed these miraculous acts is not mentioned, and if it were mentioned at all, it will be nothing more than a media story. After all, we cannot verify it. In the Anass Aouragh case, we saw another photo in the public domain, from which we could infer that there were certain injuries. However, the scars seemed to completely contradict the description in the NFI (Netherlands Forensic Institute) report, and moreover, the father reported that there were many other injuries that were not mentioned in the report. So that NFI "evidence" seemed to be falsely fabricated. In today's murder cases, we don't see evidence at all; we are told evidence. For example, evidence of the perpetrator of Savannah's murder could be found in social media chats and security camera footage. On RTL's timeline, we see a report of this "detailed reconstruction" (see here the video report). That choice of words is itself significant: it is reconstruction. After all, the literal meaning of reconstruction is "to reconstruct or repair what has been constructed.
That timeline on RTL (which won the Machiavelli Prize a year after the Anass case) is in itself worth running through. The alleged perpetrator (presumably Angelo Soares Giroto) is said to have primarily used Instagram in communicating with Savannah. He could even be seen on security camera footage. The picture shown in the process is totally meaningless, as the person on the bike is completely blurred out. Again we hear another story and again are not shown evidence for anything that would be evidence. Also in the Jinek broadcast of Friday, June 30, it is stated that the suspect and Savannah were seen together on a security camera. Those images were also blurred. Let's copy and study the timeline here:
Thursday, June 1Around noon: Savannah is taking a physics and chemistry class at Oostwende College in Bunschoten. According to a classmate, Savannah is secretly video chatting with the suspect.
12:15 p.m.: After class, Savannah picks up a sick bill. She says her hernia is bothering her.
12:52 p.m.: The suspect makes a transaction at Amersfoort station.
1:20 p.m.: The suspect informs Savannah via Instagram that he is leaving any moment. He takes bus 76 at Amersfoort station, in the direction of Bunschoten-Spakenburg.
About 1:45 p.m.: Savannah leaves home. She says she is going to a friend's house to work on a school assignment.
1:58 p.m.: Savannah sends the suspect a message via Instagram that she is at the Blue Heron (a street with a bus stop, 300 meters from her house). The suspect indicates he is in a loft.
The bus shelter where Savannah and the suspect met.1:58 p.m.: Telephone contact between Savannah and the suspect. The call lasts zero seconds.
2:12 p.m.: Savannah and the suspect are filmed by multiple surveillance cameras from businesses on De Kronkels.
2:16 p.m.: Savannah and the suspect buy soft drinks at the Gulf Gas Station at the address De Kronkels 23. Savannah debits her purchase of 1.50 euros. The suspect pays herself in cash.
2:23 p.m.: The suspect sends a chat message to a friend. He says, "Hey.
2:32 p.m.: The suspect makes a Note in his phone with contents: '...' (four dots/dots).
2:48 p.m.: Savannah sends a friend a message asking if she is coming too. The suspect also sends that same friend a message.
2:49 p.m.: Savannah's last sign of life; she is currently online for the last time.
3:11 p.m.: The girlfriend replies to the suspect: 'Yes.' And then sends: '?
3:23 p.m.: A person on a women's bicycle with a crate on the front is filmed by a company's surveillance camera. Police believe it is the suspect, on Savannah's bike. The suspect says the footage is too unclear and says he does not recognize himself in it.
3:24 p.m.: Again, a person on a women's bicycle with a crate on the front is filmed at the address Voltaweg 30. This is done by a surveillance camera. Again, police believe this is the suspect. The suspect says the footage is too unclear and says he does not recognize himself in it.
3:25 p.m.: A boy with a woman's bicycle and crate is filmed on Edison Road. He turns around halfway down the street. The boy is not wearing a jacket, but has a backpack stowed in front of the crate on the bike. Also in this image, the suspect does not recognize himself.
Police suspect the person in this photo is the suspect on Savannah's women's bike (Photo: RTL News).3:25 p.m.: A friend of the suspect asks him via chat, "Where?
3:37 p.m.: The girlfriend asks the suspect via chat, "Who?
3:53 p.m.. The suspect sends Savannah a message via Instagram to the effect that the bus is not running.
4:11 p.m.: The suspect asks who can call him because he has been bored all day.
4:26 p.m.: The suspect chats with a friend and replies, "Amersfoort.
4:33 p.m.: The suspect uses the Internet on his phone via the transmitter mast at Stationsplein in Amersfoort.
About 6 p.m.: Savannah does not come home. She had promised to be home "before dinner.
Around 7:30 p.m.: A passerby sees a black women's bicycle, brand Cortina, with a black crate in front of the handlebars, in the verge on Monseigneur van de Weteringstraat in Hoogland. Investigation reveals that this is Savannah's bicycle.
7:35 p.m.: A friend asks the suspect via chat what he was doing with Savannah. The suspect replies that he prefers to tell her this on Skype.
8:03 p.m.: The suspect searches his phone via Google for the term "kruidvat opening hours den bosch.
About 9 p.m.: Savannah's mother reports her daughter missing to police.
9:43 p.m.: The suspect receives a text message saying, "Verify your Instagram account with 921 354.
10:09 p.m.: A friend of Savannah's logs into Savannah's Instagram account at the request of Savannah's mother. She sends a message to a friend saying, "I'm [...] now.
11:20 p.m.: Savannah's mother posts a message on Facebook. She writes, "Who has seen our daughter after 3 p.m. this afternoon? As of that time, her cell phone is off and we have not heard from her. We are extremely worried. Will you please share this message?
Friday, June 212:00 - 12:30 p.m.: The suspect meets with a friend in Oisterwijk. He receives a call from the police during that appointment, at which point he says he hasn't spoken to Savannah in about two or three weeks.
Morning and afternoon: Savannah's mother's appeal is shared massively on Facebook.
5 p.m.: A girl's body is found in a ditch in Achterveld. It turns out not to be Savannah's, but Romy Nieuwburg's.
Saturday, June 3Morning: Savannah's grandmother makes an emotional appeal to RTV Utrecht: "Darling, do me a favor and come home. Let's hear from you sweetheart!"
8:32 p.m.: Police listen in as the suspect calls a friend. He agrees with her to lie to police about where and with whom he was around the time of the disappearance.
Sunday, June 49 a.m.: 700 volunteers begin search for Savannah.
About 11:38 a.m.: Police receive a report that a body has been found near De Kronkels in Bunschoten. The body lies in a ditch, partially decomposed. It was found by a man walking his dog nearby.
Police are investigating in De Kronkels industrial park after the body was found. (Photo: ANP)7:34 p.m.: The suspect posts a message on Facebook: 'Who can I ride abroad with? Thankss in advance!
8:42 p.m.: Police listen in as the suspect calls a friend. He says not to worry in a foreign country.
11:20 p.m.: Police report that the body found is Savannah's. They assume "that Savannah was killed by a crime.
Monday, June 501:02: The suspect is arrested, at home in Den Bosch. In his bedroom, the police find a backpack containing items belonging to Savannah. These include a bank card, a half-burned identity card, a Rabobank card and a bunch of keys with three keys, including a bicycle key from Savannah's bike.
The Prosecutor's Office said in a response, "The Prosecutor's Office regrets that sensitive information about the cause of death is being made public at this stage of the investigation. The investigation, including the cause of death, is only a month in the making and still in full swing. While we understand that there are many questions, in the interest of the investigation we cannot answer them at this time."
The above official reading is bursting with baloney! For starters, Savannah's mother reports her missing to the police at 9:00 p.m. that night. With today's tech tools, which we have been bombarded with since forever, it should be obvious that everyone is fully monitored anytime, anywhere. That is, every smartphone leaves an exact traceable trail. If you ever watch a CSI series or other type of police series, then you know that not only does this technology exist, but through all the media statements about legislation introduced for it, we can be sure that this technology is being used. So the cell phone of both Savannah and the alleged perpetrator could be instantly traced. The investigators can also immediately see that the two are in contact, and through the polling history, the link between the two smartphones can immediately be established. The police should be immediately alerted by the two phones having been in the exact same location. Police should even be able to see the exact trace of the two. That data should have immediately made the alleged perpetrator a suspect. You might say, "Yeah, but Savannah was only missing and not murdered at the time, so the police weren't that on edge yet." So why (according to the story) did they call the suspect the next morning? Why did they call at all? It should have been clearly legible from the phone trace that the two were in the same place at the same time and so an arrest should have followed immediately to question the boy. Nothing of the sort.
The entire timeline above gives the impression that the police and judiciary still only have technology from the 1980s. That is bollocks. All of everyone's data is stored these days. You can even buy it from the servers of social media companies and Google (real time). "But maybe the suspect or Savannah had the location data turned off!" Do you seriously think that is still a problem? Once there is connection to transmission towers, your location can be probed exactly; even if you turn off your phone. Back in 2016, legislation was implemented by Minister Ard van der Steur that made this polling possible. How long do we want to be fooled? Police and justice can track anyone at any time, but it took until Sunday morning until Savannah was found? They did not have the ability to start searching from Friday with search dogs and helicopter (with FLIR camera) and find anything at all? Surely Savannah was already missing and there had been another murder (that of Romy) in the same area; surely that should make them extra alert and immediately active?
Not to mention the remarkable story that the suspect supposedly posted a message on Facebook asking who could take him abroad. He allegedly even called a friend and told her that you don't have to worry abroad. The boy has known since Friday (according to the media story) that he is under the scrutiny of police, but would only now be making plans to go abroad (and also posting this on Facebook)? Smart guy! And, of course, he also very cleverly made sure not to leave any trace of Savannah (cynicism) by taking Savannah's bag of belongings and bike key home with him. Oh well, the boy will probably be psychologically examined and found to have a not too high IQ. Not a turd is true about this spun media story.
I wrote before that there is very possibly a psyop spin, with fabricated murders and fabricated killers. Please read my thoughts on that again in this article and this one (see all articles here). To what end? In that context, you have to understand the thinking of Niccolo Machiavelli and know that an important media prize is named after that. Machiavelli propagated that you may use trickery and deceit to get a firmer grip on the population. Are we being played by the maxim Problem, Reaction, Solution? You create a problem situation yourself, cause a certain reaction among the population and then offer a solution that gives you more power and grip on the population. In this case, that could revolve around, for example, working on legislation whereby minor children can be pre-emptively detained for observation without a clear indication. Minister Edith Schippers already did a bill in that direction once where adults were concerned. It seems that the mindset of the population needs to be pushed in that direction after all. Also, this (possible) psyop will be able to contribute to the desire for a national DNA database. We can wait for the media to come out soon with a story of DNA evidence found on the victims. It will be another story about evidence whose proof you and I will never face. Case closed. There is also an additional alibi for even more legislation to watch and intervene in social media communications in real time.
As long as we keep smearing our eyes with media stories and tales of evidence without hard evidence, the Machiavelli Prize will continue to be handed out. And even if you are shown evidence, the question is whether it is not fabricated evidence to keep the psyop going. Here is 1x more of my thoughts on this matter that I posted on my Facebook timeline on June 15. If you take into account the possibility that we are dealing with a psyop and the possibility that both the victims and the perpetrators play a role, then you can therefore still capture (reconstruct) any scenario on film. Note: in such a scenario the lawyer of the alleged suspect of Savannah (as seen in the broadcast of Jinek) then also plays along. Not to mention Eva Jinek.
Forgive me for expressing my thoughts for a moment, but sometimes the feeling creeps up on me that in this Romy & Savannah case we are being completely fooled. What if no dead girls were found at all? The funerals were shrouded in secrecy and cameras were kept at a great distance. Savannah Dekker's father posted another manhole cover grill video on the day of Savannah's missing.
It may sound far-fetched; costs a duidt to arrange such a hoax and, of course, you have to make sure the girls continue in Far-away-gie-stan under a different identity...but I am not convinced of the parenting of the parents. A fake ID card (for a desired last name) is easily created by the builders of such a hoax. After all, Romy's mother sent me her own ID card as well as Romy's. Why would she do that on the day of and the day after the funeral? Why would she respond to me at all? That the girls did actually exist, I clarified in my previous post.
I also got the name of the alleged perpetrator through (Romy's alleged killer). I can hardly find anything about that either and when I ask further I hear nothing more.
Possible scenario (Problem):
Well-prepared hoax, bag of money for the participants and fake friends, bag of money for the "parents," a year of preparation so the girls became a familiar face in the area (lots of social media activity)Possible Goal (Reaction):
Social unrest in the Netherlands, mount a large search operation and young perpetrators (who are not real perpetrators and may not even exist)Possible Desired Outcome (Solution):
Grip on social media; state may look into everything and without pardon place children in a youth care institution under supervision and re-educate themWhy would they do/fake such a thing? According to the book "Il Principe" by Nicolo Machiavelli, in order to achieve great goals with great social impact and more control over the people, you may use trickery and deceit to get the people in control. And after that Machiavelli is named the most important media prize in the Netherlands. Once Bauke Vaatstra won that prize....
They remain stories. In the video below, you can see Edward Snowden briefly explain what the services are capable of. Knowing this, it is safe to say that the aforementioned reconstruction and the described timeline, becomes very implausible.
Source link entries: rtl.co.uk, metronieuws.co.uk
Leave A Reply