The Jos Brech: "Tashin hankali" kawai bayan rani 2019

yi a SANTA NICKY by akan 12 Disamba 2018 10 Comments

source: nieuwsblad.be

Daga livetream tweets van Saskia Belleman mai labarun Telegraaf, yana nuna cewa wannan Nicky Verstappen (presumptive) rashin lafiyar kwayar halitta ba kome bane illa lacca. Wasu tweets sun bi abin da zai nuna cewa Jos Brech ya yarda cewa yana da yara batsa a kan PC, amma sun ce sun kama su da ƙwayoyin cuta. Jos Brech ya ce yana fara magana lokacin da lokaci ya dace kuma cewa wannan lokacin ya zama cikakke idan ya fara fahimtar abin da ke gudana. Shin kawai muna shaida ne game da dan wasan kwaikwayo wanda ya cika aikinsa tare da lauyan lauya?

Har ila yau akwai ɗan lokaci kaɗan ta wurin ambata cewa Mai Shari'a na aiki a kan tsarin 3D game da samin DNA da aka samu a kan matsalolin Nicky Verstappen. Jos Brech kuma dole ne ya je cibiyar cibiyar Pieter Baan don nazarin ilimin basira da kuma yadda aka gabatar da lamarin kuma an gabatar da shi kuma fitina ta hanyar watsa labaran babban nasara ne a wannan Matsalar Matsala, Magani shari'ar don inganta yarda da bayanan DNA na kasa.

Ayyukan mu'ujiza ba su fito ba daga duniya. Yana da bincike mai sauri, ba shakka, kuma ba aiki ba ne, amma ba zato ba tsammani akwai tsohon fayil na Jos Brech, wanda zai bayyana cewa zai yi zina da 'yan mata marasa adalci. An ba da wannan batu a yanayin, amma wannan ba kome ba ne. Bitrus R. de Vries bai iya shirya wannan lokaci ba tare da duk abokan hulɗarsa a cikin 'yan sanda cewa an samu babban fayil ɗin, amma ba zato ba tsammani babu wata hanya! Mai girma! Ba su yi adalci ga 'yan sanda da shari'a ba.

Har ila yau an sake samun labaran jarida! Wannan kuma shi ne babban bincike! Kada mu sake farawa nan da nan game da Photoshop da sauran hanyoyin. Breaking labarai! Ba a ambaci sunan Jos Brech a cikin labarin ba. Shin, ba a bayyana a lokacin da Jos Brech zai zama zaɓaɓɓen sunan ga wanda ya taimaka wajen yada wannan PsyOp (aiki na ruhaniya) ba? Labarin ya rushe a kowane bangare kuma saboda karar ranar 12 Disamba yana zuwa, lokaci ya kasance don farkawa da ƙarfafa gizo-gizo.

Wannan tarihin 'yan sanda tun 2014 na daga cikin tsarin tsaftacewa na dijital Mu kawai ba sa kira shi kyau. Da cewa dukkanin waɗannan takardun dole ne su kasance tare da bincike na 1 na dogon lokaci, ba mu ambaci:

A cikin Shirin Bayani na Ma'aikatar 2014-2017, CDD + an sanya shi a matsayin kayan aiki na yau da kullum domin adanawa da musayar takardu a cikin laifin aikata laifuka da kuma sassan kasashen waje.

source: telegraaf.nl

Yanzu zahiri za a iya jaddada cewa irin wannan rubutun na tarihin shafi na wuta ne na aiki, amma kuma a cikin tsoffin lokutan tarihin da kake da wani littafi tare da bayanan da kwanan wata da sauran alamu ba tare da damu ba. Kamar ɗaukar cewa an lalata fayil din, ana ganin an cire ni da aka ba dukkanin hankalin jarida ta hanyar Peter R. de Vries. Yi kuskure ya nuna cewa dole ne ku yi 33 shekara don neman irin wannan fayil! A gaskiya, shekaru ashirin, saboda batun Nicky Verstappen yana da shekara ashirin. Ya kasance mai ban mamaki.

Wannan har yanzu an raba shi daga gaskiyar cewa wani yiwuwar watsar da aka yi watsi da 1985 bai samar da wata hujja a wannan yanayin ba, amma ana ganin zai taimaka wajen ƙarfafa tsarin 'fitina ta hanyar watsa labarai'.

source: rtlnieuws.nl

Yawancin lokuttan kisan kai da suka karu da yawa a cikin kafofin watsa labarai yanzu an warware su da kalmar sihirin DNA. To, an warware su ta hanyar gwaji ta hanyar kafofin watsa labarai by Peter R. de Vries don to matsar da kafofin watsa labarun zuwa kotun da ke ɗaukar hukuncin da jama'a ke rataye, ba tare da wata kariya ba.

Har ila yau, shari'ar kansu sun juyo Saskia Belleman tweet circuses, inda babu wanda ya fi kyan gani sosai. A cikin akwati Nicky Verstappen ya unknown shekaru da yawa ko kisan kai, rai ba, ko fyade, amma ba zato ba tsammani akwai kafin ƙarewar da ya rage mata lokaci a yuwuwar laifin. Kowane doka mulki da aka karya a cikin wannan labarin, amma cewa bai hana kome ba, saboda tausaya na mutane da aka buga ta Peter R. de Vries da wani kuka uwa Nicky. Wannan yayi abubuwan al'ajabi. Ba za a sake yin tambaya game da tunani ba. Motsi shine kawai jagora.

Abin da ke cikin wannan hali shine DNA daga mutane daga na hudu da na biyar na iyalan iyali don amfani da Jos Brech. Idan wannan ya haifar da wasan da DNA ta samo a kan tufafi na Nicky Verstappen, shin wadannan mutane sunyi tsammanin kansu? Kuma me ya sa Jos Brech ya zaɓi ya ɓace kansa a cikin wani hali inda aka kashe kisan kai, ko kisan kai, ko kuma cin zarafi? Ba dole ba ne, domin babu wani abu. Amma sa'a, OM ta ventriloquist Peter R. de Vries ya riƙe k'wallo don turawa ta ƙarshe: DNA na Jos Brech ya ba da kwatsam a kan tufafin Nicky Verstappen. Bugu da komai don tofa yaudara. Idan gaskiyar ba ta kasance ba, za ka iya yin nazarin sabon labarin bayan shekaru 20. Idan jama'a na ci gaba da zama masu mahimmanci, kawai kuna kira don batsa na yara a kan PC na (wanda aka riga ya ɗauka).

Na ambata wannan tsari kafin 'Yin mai kisan kai'da' Peter R. de Vries jarrabawar ta hanyar kafofin yada labarai '. Kuma idan mutane sun ce babu wata shaida game da kisan kai ko cin zarafi, ka ce kawai jikin Nicky ya yi yawa don ya karbi shaida mai kyau a autopsy. Wannan yana da kuskuren sakamakon sakamako na autopsy a wasu lokuta kisan kai, babu wani abu kuma. Yana da game da kunna motsinku da kuma shirya hoton da kake so.

Kamar dai an yi mana wasan kwaikwayo akai-akai a cikin 'yan shekarun nan tare da manyan al'amurran da DNA ta zama kamar yadda aka yanke shawara. Kodayake rashin tunani ya ɓace, DNA ya kasance kalmar sihirin. A Marianne Vaatstra hali ya ba da kafofin watsa labaru circus mahaifin Bauke Vaatstra Machiavelli, ko da farashin, amma Niccolò Machiavelli (bayan wanda kyauta ne mai suna) da aka a fili "kõme ba su yi" tare da yaudara da kuma yaudara. Idan muka yi yawa tare da manyan PsyOp (Psychological Operation) al'amurran da suka shafi don inganta ra'ayin cewa wani muhimmin DNA database yana da muhimmanci a warware matsalolin kisan kai, sa'an nan kuma watakila ya kamata mu duba more a kan abubuwan da irin wannan database. Menene jihar za ta yi da ita?

Da farko, an kawar da wani shari'ar doka mai muhimmanci a cikin batun Nicky Verstappen - Jos Brech. An yi amfani da DNA na Jos Brech a cikin wata doka. Wato shine: An dauki DNA na Jos Brech a cikin wani abin da ya ɓace (wanda ake zargin kansa), amma an yi amfani da shi a cikin batun Nicky Verstappen. Lauya Gerald Roethof ya tabbatar a fili ya zama lauya na PsyOp a nan, domin saboda wannan dalili kadai zai iya cire Jos Brech daga hannunsa. A yanzu shi ne doka ba zato ba tsammani sabili da haka ba bisa doka ba. Ya yiwu ya yi matukar muhimmanci a nan, amma ya kasa yin haka. Kullin shari'a wanda aka riga ya aika don wannan dalili (a cikin tunanin mutane) shine abin da za'a iya samo DNA daga ɗayan bayanai don kowane hali. Har ila yau, taron na Jos Brech, ya riga ya zama babban gudunmawa, a lokacin da asusun yanar gizon ke zuwa. Mai adalci ba zai iya yin amfani da DNA kawai ba, amma har ma a wasu lokuta.

Saboda haka, inda aka mayar da hankali ga sababbin sababbin kafofin watsa labarai na zamani,DNA DNA ta kasance a kan masu ruhu'kuma'an gano batirin yara'da Gerald Roethof a cikin wannan hoton na Pauw (duba a nan) ya ci gaba da tattaunawar game da wannan sidetrack, ya kamata ya mayar da hankali ga duk abin da aka mayar da shi game da yin amfani da DNA daga abin da aka ɓace a cikin wani laifin kisan kai (wanda babu wanda yake faruwa). Wannan 'babu wanda ya kasance' na sanya a tsakani, domin (ina sake maimaita shi) babu wani kisan kai ko kisan kai, ko kuma batun cin zarafi. Duk wani nau'i na goyan baya wanda ya nuna wannan ya ɓace. Wato shine: NFI ba ta taba nuna kisan kai ba, kisan kai ko cin zarafi. Saboda haka babu wani abu. Babu wani hali. Akwai DNA kawai a kan wadanda ba su da wata damuwa, amma wasan da wannan DNA an samu bisa doka ba. Gerald Roethof zai iya samun Jos Brech kyauta. Amma idan akwai wata} wa}} waran labarun ingantaccen bayanan yanar gizon, to, ba ka so mai yin wasan kwaikwayo na dan wasan ya fita daga cikin umarnin da ake tsare shi. Sa'an nan kuma kawai kuna so kuyi la'akari da tabbacin labarin ta hanyar zama kamar lauya mai kyau.

Wannan lamari na Jos Brech yana da muhimmiyar doka. Ba wai kawai ya taimakawa - kamar maganin Vaatstra - zuwa ra'ayin cewa DNA shine kalmar sihiri kuma saboda haka dole mu matsa zuwa wuri mai sauri. Mafi mahimmanci, Gerald Roethof yana da alhakin tabbatar da cewa babu wani abu da aka yi amfani da shi ga yin amfani da wannan DNA wanda aka tattara a wani akwati. A takaice: sau ɗaya a mallakin DNA ɗinka, jihar nan da nan za ta iya yin amfani da shi don wani abu! Capiche? Dawa! Saboda haka tsaron gidan Roethof yana da nisa!

Idan jihar nan da sannu zã da DNA profile kowane mutum a nasu allurar rigakafin, da kuma taimaka wa samar da kowa da kowa tare da CRISPR Nano-Bots, sa'an nan za ka iya tunanin da android gyara zabin iya samar da wannan? Ko kuwa ba ku san wannan kalma ba? Jihar yana tunanin 10 matakai gaba. Kai ma?

Ta hanyar dokar bada kyauta, jihar ta zama mai mallakin jikin ku. Saboda haka an yarda da shi don gyarawa. Gerald Roethof ya dauki ƙofa don a yarda da amfani da DNA a nan (maimakon kawai a cikin wani bincike na shari'a wanda aka karbi DNA).

Dole a bai wa Roethof bene a lokacin rubutawa. Ina mamaki idan ya karanta wannan (bKiln wurare game da kare Roethof ne a gaskiya a sake post daga daya labarin daga 9 Nuwamba 2018) don ƙoƙarin ba da tsaro ga dan kadan. Idan Roethof ya sake yin amfani da DNA ba bisa ka'ida ba (wanda aka samu ta hanyar mutumin da ya ɓace), ya sake nuna cewa shi mai lauya ne.

KARANTA DA KARANTA SANTAWA

Jerin abubuwan haɗin tushen: telegraaf.nl, justid.nl, telegraaf.nl

24 Hannun jari

tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Game da Author ()

Comments (10)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Martin Vrijland ya rubuta:

    De Telegraaf ya sake zama ta hanyar sanya rubutu mai zuwa a cikin labarin da aka ambata:
    https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/2908300/jos-b-spreekt-tegen-familie-nicky-verstappen

    "An kashe Verstappen kuma ana iya cin zarafinsa a lokacin wani sansanin zafi a kan Brunssummerheide a 1998. Rashin mutuwarsa ba shi da dadewa na dogon lokaci, har sai babban binciken binciken DNA na B. ya zo cikin hoto. An gano DNA a cikin sha bakwai a kan tufafin yaron. "

    Babu tabbaci game da kisan kai ko kisan kai. Akwai kuma har yanzu ba a zahiri ba ne kisan kai ko zalunci. Ba a tabbatar da su ba. Kuma idan ba'a nuna wannan ba, zaka iya sanya shi a cikin rami mai zurfi a cikin tsaron. Bayan haka, zai iya zama mutuwa ta halitta (cututtuka na zuciya ko kuma sunanka).

    Har ila yau, gaskiyar cewa Roethof bai ambata wannan ba, amma kawai ya mayar da hankali ne kan rashin samun cikakken bayani da kuma samun dama ga wannan bayanin, ya nuna cewa shi mai lauya ne.

  2. Sunshine ya rubuta:

    Zai yiwu ya zama da amfani a san cewa wanda ake zargi bayan an tsare shi (yawanci bayan 3 kwanakin da 15 hours bayan kama) dole ne a kawo shi gaban kwamishinan alƙali wanda zai yanke hukuncin kama da tsare. Wannan ya faru ne a ka'idar doka a wannan mataki cewa lauyoyin ba su yi mafi kyau ba saboda in ba haka ba za a ƙi taimakon tallafin asusun. Idan lauya ya sami kyauta a wannan lokacin, ba zai karɓi kudi ba idan Brech ba shi da kudin samun kudin shiga. Lalle ne, dalilin mutuwa yana da muhimmanci. Dole ne a bayyana. A irin wannan hali dole ne ka bari masana harkokin waje / NFI suyi ra'ayi na biyu, musamman saboda wannan lamarin yana jin dadin wannan tallace-tallace. Wannan yana da manufa. An shirya kome a cikin Netherlands. Kuma lauyoyi suna wasa saboda dalilai da dama.

    • Martin Vrijland ya rubuta:

      Dalilin wannan shari'ar shine cewa babu wani shari'ar da kuma shaidar shaidar DNA da aka samu bisa doka ba a cikin wani batu na rashin (kasancewar ake zargin cewa bace Jos Brech ba). Wannan ya saba da dokokin da ake ciki yanzu don haka Jos zai iya fitar da shi nan da nan daga kare hakkin.
      A halin yanzu, Roethof ya zubar da hankalin wannan ta hanyar kasancewa mai kyau tsaro.

  3. Martin Vrijland ya rubuta:

    A kowane hali, ya bayyana a fili cewa Twitter na kan aiwatar da rubutun Martin Vrijland. Tweets da ita tare da hakkin # kawai ba su bayyana a kan ta Twitter lokaci ... kamar tweets zuwa Peter R. de Vries.

    • Martin Vrijland ya rubuta:

      Facebook kuma ba za ta bar kome ba. A halin yau ana hotunan hotunan, saboda haka ya zama marar ganewa. Mutane basu da damar danna kan wani abu ba tare da hoto ba.

      Na yi amfani da dubban dubban baƙi ta hanyar Facebook. A zamanin yau an rage shi zuwa ƙananan mutane a kowace rana.

  4. Heray ya rubuta:

    Abin da na gane shi ne cewa Jos B. ba ya so ya amsa tambayar yadda DNA ta zo a kan tufafin Nicky. A cewar lauya, ya zo daga baya tare da sanarwa. Amma me ya sa ba ya ce kawai bai san haka ba? Wannan ita ce mafi amsar amsar, ko ya kasance mai aikata ko a'a.

    Har ila yau, ina tsammanin mutane da yawa suna da hannu, watakila Jos B, amma lalle wasu. Daga cikin littafin The m mutuwa na Nicky Verstappen Simon Vuyk bayyana cewa Barten Joos, daya daga cikin sansanin da shugabannin, san inda jikin Nicky da aka je za a samu. Har ila yau, yana nuna cewa akwai alaƙa ga wanda yayi aiki a Ma'aikatar Shari'a. Zai yiwu ainihin halin dole ne ya ɓace gaba ɗaya ko wani ɓangare a cikin murfin.

    • Martin Vrijland ya rubuta:

      All ban sha'awa shagala kamar yadda ka gane cewa shi ne kawai a psyop gabatar da DNA database da kuma unmarked subversion dokokin cewa ya ce za ka iya kawai amfani da DNA a gudanar da bincike wanda aka tattara.

      A takaice, da zarar DNA a cikin wani bayanai, ana iya amfani da shi a ko'ina. Wannan kyauta na damar RIVM, alal misali. A DNA database ne sai mai kyau ilmi tushe ga Big Data analysis (misali hereditary matsaloli "tayar da kayar baya Oppositional Halayyar '), ga zanen jariran, vpor musamman alluran da ba za ka iya ba su suna ba shi.

      • Martin Vrijland ya rubuta:

        Wannan shine dalilin da ya sa yake da mahimmanci da karfin gaske cewa mahaɗin ya bar wannan batu. Dole ne Roethof ya bukaci a ba da shi nan da nan saboda Shari'a ta Bayar da Shari'ar Jama'a ta samu DNA na Jos Brech a cikin wani shari'ar da ta bambanta da batun Nicky Verstappen. Ba'a yi amfani da wannan DNA ba.

        Wannan shi ne sake maye gurbin dokokin da ake ciki kuma ya samar hanya don cire wannan iyaka a nan gaba.

        • Sunshine ya rubuta:

          Matsalar ita ce ba mu zama a cikin doka ba. Tsarin shari'a ya lalata. Ba zamu iya tsammanin wani abu daga gurbata ba. Kuma bayin suna ganin sabulu da wadanda ake zargin suna cike da hayaki da madubin ga gaskiya. Duk wanda ke cikin Netherlands ya halarci. Babu wani irin abin da ya rage da dama, babu masu adawa. Duk da haka, akwai wani cake (ikon da kuɗi) wanda aka ƙayyade ga mambobi na Club mai zaman kansa, mahaifa.

Leave a Reply

Ta hanyar ci gaba da yin amfani da shafin, kun yarda da amfani da kukis. ƙarin bayani

An saita saitunan kuki a kan wannan shafin yanar gizon don 'ƙyale kukis' don ba ka damar kwarewa mafi kyau.Idan ka ci gaba da amfani da wannan shafin ba tare da canza saitunanka ba ko ka danna kan "Karɓa" a ƙasa sai ka yarda da wadannan saitunan.

Kusa