Everyone is suddenly talking about the opinion of the Council of State on adding admission ticket, curfew and school closure to the new and permanent "corona law" (or "pandemic law"), and it seems mostly that poor dear Ernst Kuipers needs to be helped a little soft out of the social resistance under the guise of "advice," but it mostly proves the role of the royal house in this state terror against the people.
The Council of State seems to be another one of those little clubs where you think, "Ah, that's more like a ceremonial group that sits there mainly for advice and as a soft control of politics"; a kind of tea party for former politicians so as not to leave them idly sitting in the waiting room; a kind of honorary job for members of the royal family.
"The Council of State was established in 1531 by Emperor Charles V as an advisor to the governor and is one of the oldest surviving governmental bodies in the world," according to Wikipedia. William Alexander is president of the Council of State. Now that is delightfully downplayed by Wikipedia and that position is again dismissed as ceremonial, because Thom de Graaf of D66 is vice president and would be in actual charge. But that is again the familiar distraction. The president of the Council of State is Willem Alexander.
So William Alexander is the chief, and Thom gets to speak occasionally when William sails on his yacht or flies to Greece while the people are in lockdown.
The Council of State is a "governmental body. So that doesn't say 'advisory body,' it says 'governmental body,' which means it governs. Or did you think that perhaps the choice of words was somewhat unfortunate and not really meant that way? "Yes, but the king's role is really ceremonial you know!" No, you are led to believe that. The role of the king is "to rule"; hence "governmental body" and mind you it is also the supreme "judicial body"; which specifically means that it can overrule court rulings.
Every time you see the word "advisory" pop up on sites like Wikipedia or in the media, scratch your head behind the ears. If it is written "The Council is an important advisory body to the government," you can replace it with:
The Council of State imposes on the installed government - through the illusion of sham democracy and sham elections - what it must legislate.
And the full media made a cute event out of the fact that Amalia was gifted (read: automatically appointed) a seat on the Council of State for her eighteenth birthday, but there is nothing cute about that. Both Willem Alexander and Maxima and now so daughter Amalia sit on the highest governing body we have in the Netherlands. The total number is 10 and all have been appointed by 'the crown'. That term "the crown" is the name given to the institution presided over by "the king" (or the previous regent).
It should be clear by now that we are not ruled by The Hague. We are ruled (we let ourselves be ruled by tacit consent) by Willem Alexander, Maxima and Amalia. Three people who decide everything. The other 7 members of the Council swear allegiance to those same people, so if you swear allegiance you must follow (otherwise you are disloyal).
Hence, still 'We William Alexander by the grace of God...' is the beginning of every law. The actual supreme power is 'the crown' represented by the regent of the moment (now William Alexander, formerly Beatrix, Juliana, and so on). That D66 started a mock debate in the House of Representatives (of actors) in 2016 was nothing more than an attempt to make the application of that term seem ceremonial (see these chamber documents), with the end result that this all-encompassing little rule just stayed in.
Now don't think that it will ever be scrapped, because it is the essence of the political sham, where you (the people) must believe that we live in a democracy, when in fact we are governed by "the crown" and the incumbent regent signs all laws on behalf of that crown "by the grace of God.
Well, the response of Secretary General of the Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations Maarten Schurink to a WOO request from a reader, dated Aug. 15, 2022 is crystal clear: There are no records in the ministry that prove this grace of God. It is based on a Bible text. In other words, the grace of God is missing and thus any law that begins with "We William Alexander by the grace of God..." (Or We Beatrix, Juliana, etcetera) does not apply to you. The emperor has no clothes on.
So if there is a new pandemic law, then you can reject any measure, any fines or court invitations. You can do the same with all other pre-existing legislation. You do this by sending a simple bill. Sample letters can be found by clicking on the button below. Comments can be sent to: [email protected]
to degratiegods.comLink entries: ad.co.uk, wikipedia.org, officielebekendingen.co.uk
18 Comments
Hi Martin,
Again thank you for all the info and I am left with the following and that is the supposed identity imposed by the state. On my birth certificate I am only my first name and not complete with last name.
The state creates that and hangs your BSN on that and on that they are going to prosecute you as if you have a contract and therefore a duty. What is left to do with that? How could we reject this?
Then the car that has to be "in your name" at purchase, if you do this then you give the right of ownership to the state but without a transfer no indemnification and no seller will do away with the car. I would quite like a car without all that fuss and hassle. Do you have any idea and I understand it gets easier when legions of people start doing the same thing.
Theoretically, you can just drive around without a license and registration.
You will get the police after you, but they can then point out the missing pardon of God.
No one has tried it, and if I tell you that someone got away with a huge fine and a seizure, no one will believe it because I don't have video evidence.
If the king has no power, the king's lackeys are also powerless. "Yes, but then I will become this or that" That fear keeps us in line and that fear is programmed by the media that keeps us in a Truman Show reality.
I am thinking about my questions some more and maybe a rejection of the BSN is as simple as the rest.
And as for the car do this transfer to get it in "possession" and then reclaim it in the same way perhaps.
Anyway, I'm curious what you think about it and see a solution to it.
And I hope a lot of people follow up with that we are at least tying the system up well and it might get completely bogged down.
Yes, perhaps. You're only stuck with the practical consequences that you'll no longer have a passport and thus won't be able to fly.
But (and beware!) soon you won't have one either if you have to wear a digital "health passport" in the chip under your skin (or stored as a code in your DNA). This, of course, will happen incrementally. First, that fancy QR code app will be used for that purpose.
In short, anyone who thinks they now have a passport and are safe to travel with it: that fly will soon be no more.
The same will start to apply to accessing your digital money (your bank account). If you have an invalid digital passport because your health credits are insufficient (because you have not been vaccinated), there will be a problem there too. Welcome to the world wide web.
So we are gradually arriving at a time when we need to prepare ourselves mentally to be placed outside the system OR we are already making a start on that ourselves. Neither will be easy.
Now you haven't answered back the question about the car, because if I want to buy a car I am obliged to put it in my name otherwise I won't get the car.
You have to start doing everything illegally. That is, you do it outside the "legal" system; outside the system of laws. That's because ALL laws are signed by the institution the crown, represented by the sitting "regent" at who sits there with the missing grace of God.
It takes some getting used to and you will be opposed by the system on all fronts, but that system is like a swamp; it sucks you in up to your neck and the deeper you are in it the harder it becomes to get out.
Not only will you have problems with "putting your car in your name" (giving it away to the state in exchange for use), but also with renewing your driver's license and passport. In addition, banks may start to make trouble if you don't identify according to that "legislature's" system. The point is that the system is going to pull harder and harder and everything is going to be digitized.
In other words, if you like living a peaceful life and don't want any problems, bow down to the system and do whatever it wants. If you want change, it's going to hurt. It's not going to be easy. Getting sucked into the swamp feels much softer if you don't resist. Getting out in time will prevent you from sinking and losing your identity completely.
You don't have to immediately change course on all fronts, but start by stopping filing tax returns, paying for mandatory "health insurance," paying rent and energy. Then you'll have money left over to organize your life differently.
A good acquaintance has had a good relationship with his employer for many years. He is often sent abroad by his employer, which is
part of his job.
Think also of pilots and other carriers who undergo this.
He had decided not to get prodded a few months ago, a few days later the resignation letter was literally on the mat.
With reluctance, he had to get himself prodded in order to keep his job otherwise he could no longer afford the mortgage for the family.
So what Martin is saying here is already happening
Oh well, he'll lose that house anyway. You will own nothing. Now he has the advantage that at least he can be happy about it (if his thoughts are overwritten in real time).
Martin,
I've seen those sample letters.
But i.e. the gas and electricity, well, could
they could stop that supply then? And then what to do?
Yes, then they are going to stop the supply.
So it's better to invest the thousands of euros you'll have to pay later on in something that allows you to generate your own electricity.
I've shown several ideas about that, but it's a matter of being creative. If I can do it, so can you.
You can already hear Amalia calling during the Council of State meeting, while Thom de Graaf serves her another glass of champagne with berry juice:
"Daddy don't be so silly! Mommy and I want that school closing and curfew in so I can have another fun birthday party for my girlfriends while the rabble are sitting at home snuggled up! Don't be so soft Dad!"
These scum are cracking down on the "rabble," know your enemy.
https://www.msn.com/nl-nl/nieuws/Binnenland/rvs-heroverweeg-koppeling-verhoging-minimumloon-en-aow/ar-AA11e9gA
It is actually very simple and logical as you depict it here Martin. So you can see how many people are conditioned in the belief of a democracy. Myself included until recently. There wouldn't be many people willing to go that deep to live outside of society and when all is said and done still conform to the ruling power. Perhaps David Icke, controlled or not, is not far off from his outlined "hunger games society." Those apex predators won't get me on my knees. Thanks for another enlightening article.
ACTOR DONALD SUTHERLAND: THE HUNGER GAMES AN ALLEGORY FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
""And if there's any question as to what (the Hunger Games) it's an allegory for I will tell you ... it is the powers that be in the United States of America. It's profiteers. War is for profit. It's not to save the world, or for democracy or king and country. No, it's for the profit of the top 10%. And the young people, who see this film, must recognize that in the future blind faith in their leaders ... will get you dead.'"
https://wearechange.org/actor-donald-sutherland-the-hunger-games-an-allegory-for-the-united-states-of-america/
Question:
What about land that is supposed to belong to the municipality or province? Can't we just claim a piece of land that is supposedly public?
Yes, you can because no one has authority over you. It is only assumed and generally accepted authority, defended by the lackeys of that sham authority, but the basic principle is always the same.
The deeper essence behind why you and I even have a higher authority than these disembodied avatars of Lucifer, I explain in my latest book/essay "Freedom...
You notice that the state propagandists on "social media" try to capture and channel the discontent of the "citizens," but they just don't get to the heart of the matter. Well, why is that?
https://twitter.com/umarebru/status/1564481045642330112
https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2017/10/dutch-investors-launch-new-marketing-programme-for-nl-tristate-city/
https:// http://www.regioburgemeesters.nl/regio-s/midden-nederland/
https://www.weforum.org/people/sharon-dijksma
They play the problem, reaction, solution game. They manage/direct the reaction in the desired direction so that they can present the solution to the self-created problem as the saving grace.