Ernst Kuipers takes a professional approach! Boy, what a great minister Ernst is! He had a scientific study done and he will probably adopt the outcome. The research was conducted by TU Delft, UMC Utrecht, Populytics, Erasmus University Rotterdam and Erasmus MC. So then it must be good.
How you do such a study at the time of a progressing (supposed) pandemic, and how you then work with segregated test groups and who or what is tested where, doesn't matter. It was simply researched by the agencies mentioned, so then it must be right.
Of course, you can't study that in practice, because if we look at everyday practice, with a supposedly progressive virus, you can't say that you isolate a control group from the rest of society. So one probably does that with computer models and simulations. But there is, as usual, no newspaper or news presenter who asks, "How exactly did you conduct that research?" It is enough these days to mention a few weighty institutions.
These weighty institutions, whose conclusions are therefore not known, apparently conclude that 2G does not work. So that would imply that vaccinating does not work and that corona access, in the form of the QR code, does not get the (alleged) pandemic underway.
The recommendation would be to introduce 1G. That would then mean that everyone would have to be tested and that being vaccinated or not would no longer count for access. That would prove in itself that vaccinating makes no sense, but never mind, it's in the definition of 1G
Indeed, if you then take a closer look at the ending of the wonderful propaganda video, taken from Nu.nl (see here), you can also simply define 1G differently and then it suddenly means something quite different from "always and everywhere testing for access. Indeed, in Belgium, they call 1G the situation where you must always be fully vaccinated and thus have every future "booster shot" on your shot list.
I see a trick special lurking! Now what if this Great Reset sham cabinet Rutte IV, by virtue of Kuipers, gives the people the false hope that there will be a 1G policy, where you as an unvaccinated person can also just go in and where both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated "just have to take a little test," and then pass legislation to that effect and then simply adjust the definition of 1G to resemble Belgium's (always get your booster)? Hans Klok, come on in!
Many readers let me know personally how grateful they are for the critical sound I bring to the table. Thank you for that. We are talking about ten thousand-plus readers per day on average, and the awakening is now going like clockwork, as many see that they are being hooked on a prick subscription. Please know that the virus has never been isolated and so be sure to read this article again. Keep sharing because it helps!
join and supportSource link entries: nu.co.uk
5 Comments
Of course there is a catch. Making people happy that 2G is not coming but....
1G only for vaccinated people and always get your booster.
1G will never come for unvaccinated people.
I don't participate in it. Live my own life.
Then make a nice cup of coffee at home.
If you know the master script, then you know that eventually they want to move toward a situation where you can be monitored 24/7 and where it's possible to remotely modify your DNA and therefore your thoughts and memories. The only question is, will they succeed? The stakes are high and the risk that people will drop out en masse is huge. More and more people are starting to see through that the vaccination was not a one-off. And many people will therefore ignore the boosters. If a large part of the population stops participating, then the policy becomes unworkable.
I foresee the following scenario during 2022:
1) first 2G is introduced (coopers has blank mandate and it is already in emergency law I think so is a 1 two)
2) then 2G is gradually (but within 2 months) rolled out across all sectors so also all essential stores)
3) then vaccination requirement is introduced with very severe penalties for anyone who does not get vaccinated. The result is that 98% or more get boosted now and in April and October.
4) then a mix of 1G and 2G is introduced, so everyone must be vaccinated and also get tested everywhere.
Could someone please explain to me how it is possible that Ernst Kuipers became a minister at all from nowhere?
Dutch people can cast their votes for candidate MPs who are on the election lists (*people's representatives; are elected by the people).
Ernst Kuipers was NOT on D66's election list and thus no person could vote for this non-existent candidate MP.
Isn't it true that a person can only be elected minister if that person has been on the election list?
According to the current rules, members of parliament must give their approval to proposed ministers.
(And no, J.J.M. Kuipers, candidate No. 50, is not him; this is Robert Kuipers - Venlo).
*well, we do know how it really is, but so as not to make it too difficult I'll leave it at that.
That can occur if you don't live in a democracy.