They are wonderful, those words from Thierry Baudet about mass surveillance, exclusion and the lurking (Chinese model) social credit system (which I already wrote about before Thierry entered politics), but what is the real value of opposition in a second chamber full of cameras and actors all swearing allegiance to the king if nothing concrete happens? If it was already predicted here on the site that the war cabinet (deliberately made strategically outgoing) will stay put for a while longer by flopping the formation over and over again, so that the Rutte cabinet gets to finish tearing it down before Sigrid Kaag gets to implement the Build Back Better agenda, then surely it should be clear by now, that cheating is happening.
Politicians are not going to save us. Politicians are only there to give the rabble the illusion of choice and offer hope for change via well-spoken opposition. And yes, Thierry Baudet articulates it all excellently, but why is he not arranging real opposition and perpetuating the contagion lie? Why does he lure people back to the clicker ballot box only to give nice speeches again in that second chamber that offers nothing but entertainment and false hope? Take a look and then read on:
OK, but what's going to happen next? The cabinet is sitting there nicely governing by proxy on behalf of the king by demission to deal with the "ongoing issues," and one of those ongoing issues is the corona crisis. In short: with all that chatter in the second chamber, nothing happens. Neither does anything change with opposition in that same chamber. The only thing that would work is a coup by the people (as I have been proposing since the beginning of this fake pandemic), but the masses prefer to follow the initiatives of pawns of power and are accustomed to taking something seriously only when it has been on TV or when the entire alternative media picks it up, without realizing that that is precisely the way to manage the opposition. This direct democracy initiative is therefore silenced and optimally ignored.
"The best way to control the oppisiton is to lead it yourself," is and remains a statement that is not yet in the minds of many, but perception management through TV, radio, newspapers and social media are not only the playing field for the hundreds of millions of mainstream media and the state. The realization must sink in that the opposition is also important and full efforts are being made to capture the critics from society (see the many comments I made on this).
Opposition is allowed, as long as it is limited to chatting or to demonstrations that are announced in advance and for which permits are issued. If the opposition becomes too vocal, it will just be neatly cleaned up again. You blow up a political party with a little scandal and opposition on social media is allowed, as long as the legs are not sawn away from under the power. A little scuffing is allowed; you can paint that later when the storm has subsided and everyone has been forced back in line.
Ultimately, change can only come through action from within ourselves. I am not so much referring to standing on a square in The Hague with a banner, because that will cost you a train ticket, canvas and paint, but will not achieve much else. Change comes from within; from the field of consciousness. Don't quit right now because you find it too woolly, because it is essential to take note of it right now. I do not urge you to read my book every day because I think I can make money with book sales, but I do so because I clearly and well summarize in it how the ladies and gentlemen in the political class are steering towards a Great Reset. That reset has everything to do with the approaching end of the world and the universe as we know it. Yes, please read on to get to the bottom of that, because it is important and has little to do with religion.
In fact, the bottom line is that the there is still about 10 to 25 years to go. I arrive at that timeline based on statements made by prominent top figures such as Google Alphabet's top executive Ray Kurzweill and the transhumanist agenda now openly proclaimed also by Klaus Schwab of the WEF. While it sounds a bit like the religious "the end of times is near," however, it is more of a practical problem that these very people seem to recognize. What that practical problem is I substantiate thoroughly in my book. It is why someone like Klaus Schwab says, "We need a great reset!" Humanity - according to people like Klaus Schwab and Ray Kurzweil - needs to be transhumanized (read digitized) quickly. Indeed, these very top people believe firmly in humanity's only chance of survival in that digitized form.
When figures like Klaus Schwab make no bones about this and speak openly about it, it might still be worth taking a thorough look at it.
Once you then know what is coming, you also know where the solution lies. Therefore, the change I am talking about cannot be achieved by (proverbially) smearing typ-ex on the screen, but by changing this reality at the code level. For younger readers, typ-ex was a white type of paint that was smeared on paper before the computer age in order to retype over it with the typewriter. Back then, you didn't have word processors, software and apps where you could edit text. That was still done on a typewriter and sheets of paper. And as fast as such developments can go in one human lifetime, the digitization of biology - within one human lifetime - is still on the horizon. Just click on that last little blue link to find out. Forget those space shuttles and Space X rockets, we're not going into space with devices; we're going digital.
The big question now is: How can we bring about real change? Well, real change comes from within. In my book, I explain how we are the programmers of the original reality. Therefore, that is where the key to change lies; not in the action "on the screen." In that book I predicted not only the current (fake) pandemic in preparation for vaccination obligation, but also the transhumanization (digitization) of humanity mentioned by Klaus Schwab. I also explain the end goal (from - what I call - the master script) and show you the way to the solution that is in our hands. So time to read (and read again if you have already bought the book):
your bookFor several weeks now, Facebook has been blocking my share counter, making it seem like my articles are less popular. The opposite is true. There is a great awakening going on. Visitors keep coming and there is a lot of sharing. Help overcome the censorship, keep sharing and also support my work by becoming a member, because it is much needed.
11 Comments
Meanwhile, far-reaching legislation banning legal entities has been passed by the 1st Chamber. But the gardens are raked, the sun is shining, the terraces are open, there is soccer and Formula 1...What more could you want?
Can you give a little more info? What exactly does that ban entail?
So anything that threatens the status quo of the usual suspects will be dealt with, so this can also be a simple publisher countering state propaganda through publishing books or a website that writes a little too much truth.
This proposal eases the burden of proof for the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM) to ban and dissolve legal entities that disrupt society. In addition, this proposal ensures that executives can be banned from management for three years or more when a legal entity is banned. This prevents those people from continuing their activities in another organization. The court can also order that an organization's activities cease during the legal proceedings. Failure to comply with such a court order becomes punishable. The penalty for continuing activities of a court-banned legal entity will be doubled, to a maximum of two years in prison.
https://www.eerstekamer.nl/nieuws/20210622/kamer_steunt_verruiming_verbieden
Oh, is there. in that upcoming law also what the definition is for ' society'. After all, who or what is ' society' and who defines it? Will there be a definition in the law for ' disruption'? How will that be determined? By what standard? Or by ' society' do they mean the status quo of the club? That it should not be changed or criticized? That's possibly what it will be. Right?
Ah what am I precise the honourable members of parliament have of course studied this well long ago and that the law is drafted in accordance with human rights etc. After all, the parliament has also well figured out that the ''virus'' is not isolated. Is. Ach minor detail it is not about the facts. It is not about human rights. Not about difficulty. It's just about governing, just power.
With the introduction of digital book forms, publishers have already been sidelined and this has resulted in many books already undergoing subtle changes from their original versions. Think of it as the "evolution" of the Bible.
The movie "Wag the dog"(https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120885/) has come up many times on this site. Last week I saw a more recent version flash by friends, "Edge of darkness"(https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1226273/). We already know it all, but via Hollywood (holy forest???) they rub it under our noses one more time. Everything follows a script.
https://youtu.be/7fbw4Fj-ax8
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fbw4Fj-ax8&w=560&h=315%5D
For those who are still new and naive to the matter, don't be fooled by fine words from a politician. Theirry's words sound powerful, but have been snatched one on one from this website.
In the foreseeable future, I am sure he/his party will be back in disrepute with some scandal. Anyone who dares to speak out after that on any of the issues Thierry brings up in the above video will be immediately linked in the minds of the meek to the crazy politician who can only do "outrageous" things.
It is helpful to delve into NLP techniques. When it is clear how anchor points can be created in people's thinking, it becomes easier to recognize the dirty foul play.
@ Why do you want to know this
The only method, in my opinion, is to bounce back the NLP techniques they apply
It is helpful to delve into NLP techniques. When it is clear how anchor points can be created in people's thinking, it becomes easier to recognize the dirty foul play.
It is helpful to delve into NLP techniques. When it is clear how anchor points can be created in people's thinking, it becomes easier to recognize the dirty foul play.
It is helpful to delve into NLP techniques. When it is clear how anchor points can be created in people's thinking, it becomes easier to recognize the dirty foul play.
It is helpful to delve into NLP techniques. When it is clear how anchor points can be created in people's thinking, it becomes easier to recognize the dirty foul play.
https://www.martinvrijland.nl/nieuws-analyses/hoe-de-media-mensen-massaal-onder-hypnose-bracht-via-de-coronavirus-angst-inductie/
The policy options
The study focuses on the desirability of nine policy options, which differ in degree of intervention (by facilitating choice of vaccination, profiling it as the norm, making it more attractive by rewarding, or imposing restrictions on people who do not get vaccinated). Participants could choose between the following policy options:
1. People are given the opportunity to be vaccinated at home.
2. People are given the opportunity to get vaccinated in the evening or on weekends and at alternative locations in the neighborhood such as schools, community centers and pharmacies or at a vaccination street.
3. An intensive public campaign to encourage people to get vaccinated. Dutch celebrities who have been vaccinated are trying to convince people as ambassadors.
4. Adults who do not get vaccinated pay a one-time extra 250 euros for their health insurance. An exception is made for people who should not be vaccinated for medical reasons.
5. Adults who do get vaccinated receive a one-time 100 euro discount on their health insurance;
6. People who get vaccinated are given a vaccination certificate that allows them to continue to enter certain places (such as stores, restaurants, nursing homes, fitness centers and public transportation) when there is an outbreak of the virus in their area. People who are not vaccinated may be turned away during an outbreak.
7. People who have been vaccinated are given a vaccination certificate that allows them to enter certain places where large groups of people gather and it is not possible to keep 1.5 meters distance (such as concerts, festivals, sports games and other large-scale gatherings). People who are not vaccinated may be refused entry.
8. Adults who do not get vaccinated must have a mandatory counseling interview with a doctor who has undergone special training on how to encourage people to get vaccinated. If people refuse this interview, they will be fined 100 euros.
9. Adults who do not get vaccinated must take a corona test every two weeks at their own expense (95 euros each time) when there is an outbreak of the virus in their region, or remain in home isolation during the outbreak.
https://www.tudelft.nl/tbm/pwe/case-studies/vaccinatiebeleid
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9726519/Stanford-scientists-creating-superhero-vaccine-based-DNA-Olympic-athletes.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490
Superhero vaccination is coming. Transhumanism???? Noooooooo of course not totally not.
and this one.
https://johnbwellsnews.com/make-a-wish-foundation-to-grant-wishes-only-to-terminally-ill-children-who-are-fully-vaccinated/
Very nice and very normal make a wish foundation (Masonic charity) is not satanic at all
my sister who works in home care was refused at one of her clients.
she preferred to see a home care worker who had had both vaccines and thought differently.