In a recent post on Telegram, it came up that companies like Kraft, PepsiCo and Nestle would use aborted baby cell lines as culture to produce flavor enhancers. Reuters' fact checkers burned this idea, but did admit that it has been researched. Still, it makes you think the next time you pull open one of those bags of Lays potato chips. It also led to a search for what else we use cultured cell lines for. That will surprise you.
It is true, by the way, that aborted cell lines were used in vaccines in the recent past. This accomplished the, so much discussed here, gender manipulation that made millennial children gender neutral (XX/XY). This is not mentioned anywhere in the alternative media, because emboldened opposition is allowed to raise issues as part of the one-two punch with power, but not to saw away the chair legs under power. This gives the impression that this is a made-up story (after all, no one else is naming it), but it is nothing more than logic and a logical consequence of a discovery made during IVF (artificial insemination - invitro firtilisation) research.
A 1998 article in the New England Journal of Medicine addressed the effect of introducing multiple fertilized eggs into a uterus. The article is titled: A True Hermaphrodite Chimera Resulting from Embryo Amalgamation after in Vitro Fertilization and states, among other things:
The increase in the frequency of dizygotic twins after in vitro fertilization by a factor of about 33 implies a similar increased risk of rare twin-associated abnormalities such as chimerism. The natural incidence of chimerism is unknown. Phenotypes of XX/XY chimerism range from normal fertile males to males with hypospadias or ambiguous genitalia and hermaphroditism and fertile female hermaphrodites to phenotypically normal, fertile females
The thesis that has been posited many times here on the website is that when you use aborted baby cells from a girl for cell culture (that may sound lurid, but that is the basis of vaccine culture) and you inject that into a boy, you make that boy chimera (hermaphrodite, XX/XY). You have then injected the girls XX chromosome into a boy who naturally has the XY chromosome. This causes the chimera effect to occur. If you inject a boy-baby (aborted) cell line (XY) based vaccine into a girl (XX), you will have the same effect (XX/XY). Then consider for a moment the 22-week shot in the womb and you may understand what the effect of that might be.
In this way, the millennial generation was probably made XX/XY without being known to the masses. This led me to the conclusion that we are not merely dealing with LGBT propaganda, but with an actual worldwide covert operation of making the millennium children XX/XY, who are now young adults. This then explains the great increase in gender confusion and it also explains the LHBTI propaganda around it.
Now a new industry is emerging that uses cell lines. In this case, they are not aborted cell lines from human babies, but involve cells taken from a live animal. Of these, it is claimed that this produces stem cells, which you can use to produce muscle tissue fatty tissue. The stem cell is actually a piece of code found in every living cell, but the generally accepted assumption is that there are "stem cells. So in that assumption, living cells are used to grow muscle tissue or fat. This provides the opportunity to print out those cultured cells from a culture tank via a printer nozzle, creating printed meat (see video below and read more below).
Currently, there are about a dozen companies operating in this field worldwide, and one of them is the Israeli company Steakholder. That reminded me of the WEF Steakholders; that term Klaus Schwab is always talking about. In fact, then, this form of meat production fits right into the WEF's picture, because it takes away the need for animal husbandry and paves the way for printed meat on your plate. You may already hear Frans Timmermans rubbing his hands. Mark Rutte can also close a few more farms this way nicely! Wonderful!
The picture below shows which companies (including two Dutch companies) are all engaged in meat production based on stem cell cultivation (and read on below).
The question that then arises is what are the consequences of this. Of course, there is a lot to be said for being able to close down mass livestock farming (in which animals often live far too close together) and mass slaughterhouses. As a sixteen-year-old myself, I worked at one of those large slaughterhouses because it was the only job I could find near the farming village I lived in. The pigs were brought in alive in far too cramped trucks and then given a hot shower before a pin was shot through their heads. After the hot shower, they were less stressed and then the meat tasted better, I was told.
I worked on a production line further down the line, so never saw that myself, but of course the process was familiar. That sense of mass livestock farming and mass and automated slaughter may not even be familiar to many when they see one of those neatly packaged pieces of steak, pork tenderloin or chicken leg in the supermarket. If you took a look inside such a factory, you might get a better sense of what is on your plate. If you ask me, it is a sign of how far we have drifted from the origin of our being in all facets of our lives. So please don't watch the video below before you sit down to dinner (and read on below).
So in that context, producing meat from cultured cell lines seems like a much nicer solution. It is an excellent sell! When you think about the bestiality of mass slaughter in large meat processing plants, your stomach turns. You only have to show people the above two videos and the choice will be quickly made for many.
Cultivating meat would also eliminate the use of antibiotics. However, it does raise some questions. Although, of course, some of those questions already apply to current meat production. After all, if you eat a piece of meat from a cow in South America, you would have to ask yourself what that cow was fed with. For example, if it is corn from genetically modified Monsanto plants (now Bayer), you might wonder how healthy that piece of meat really is for you. The same goes for the milk from a cow that eats genetically modified crops. And even in Europe, those crops are plentiful.
So what questions do these printed or cultured meat products raise? Well, the first and most important question, of course, is about genetic engineering. What can one do with those cell lines? "You are what you eat" you sometimes hear people say.
If you eat something that comes from a laboratory and a mechanical production line, then there is a technical energy behind it. If you eat something that comes from mass meat production, then there is a lot of suffering behind it and well not a lot of love for the animal. We have gone far from natural and small-scale livestock farming, to mechanical production, in recent decades. False animal pandemics, such as the (non-existent) bird flu, have even caused a ban on small-scale livestock farming at home. However, that is the only right energy. Not that slaughtering your own animals is fun, but behind taking care of them is love, and at least then the slaughtering is done with respect and not in excess.
The increasingly synthetic humanity needs more and more synthetic food. That's a sliding line. My chickens are already on the roost. And by the way, eggs from your own chickens are also much more nutritious and healthy. It's time to turn the tide and start doing things differently ourselves!
Link entries: reuters.com, nejm.org, melkveebedrijf.nl
3 Comments
Again the nail on the head, Martin. About 50/60 years ago every household had something like a vegetable garden/chicken/pig or a couple of cows. Then in the month of slaughter the butcher would come and slaughter a pig, which would be hung on a ladder against the house. Throughout the year, the chickens were shredded to make a nutritious soup. The animals generally had a good life. Until the government decreed that slaughtering at home was no longer allowed. That was the beginning of making the population dependent on a centralized system. And that is where we are now. They have been holding out a sausage to us by saying that it all became easier, well it hasn't become any nicer. Now it's not only farmers and their chickens that are under attack, but also our pets: you don't want to 'fuck up' the earth by increasing the co2 emissions needed to feed your pet, do you? Get rid of that animal. It's time they put up more of these idiotic rules, hopefully then it will dawn on everyone. My advice: take your own responsibility, take good care of yourself, at least the government doesn't.
And to fish you need a fishing license, so if you're hungry you can't just hang a rod in the pond.
And besides, it's life-threatening at the beach when there's a terrible virus going around, so you're not allowed there either (even if you have a fishing license).
They have done everything they can to cut off self-sufficiency.
Besides, nowadays you have to be satisfied with a loft in an apartment building, where you have no room to remodel anything. You then have to work in pairs to pay for that. And everyone is constantly working to pay the rent or mortgage and gas, light and water for that loft where you are never actually there, because you are working to pay the bills.
You don't have time for your children because they have to go to daycare so you can work to pay the bills.
But people accept it because they don't have time to dwell on how they are imprisoned.
Happy rat race 😬😬.