After watching the latest videos from Virus Truth, I'm out: they are good! Why did I always have to be so full of criticism about them anyway? Although I have called Virus Truth controlled opposition until now, it is abundantly clear that the lawsuits filed are effective. Therefore, it is time for an admission of guilt: "Virus Truth is doing tremendously well after all. Let me explain.
Indeed, we are dealing with a caretaker cabinet that has instituted a temporary law measures covid-19, and Virus Truth is litigating against the measures of a de facto war cabinet during that period.
The allowances affair was raised very well timed so that the cabinet could dismiss itself. In such a situation, a so-called power vacuum is created, so the king asks the incumbent government to continue to govern as a caretaker cabinet and handle important ongoing matters. This completely sidelines the second chamber, even if they request nice debates or submit motions. They officially just don't participate anymore.
Of course, what Virus Truth, as well as opposition parties in politics, should have addressed first is the unconstitutional actions of a cabinet that rushed through weighty laws during that caretaker period. New government posts were even put in place, such as appointing the new state secretaries Wiersma (VVD), Van Weyenberg (D66) and Yesilgöz (VVD). Completely illegal! It is simply not allowed!
Not only did the king violate the constitution in doing so, but so did the outgoing cabinet. In fact, we are dealing with two grossly illegal acts in this caretaker cabinet:
- A temporary law is passed that shows no nature of temporality other than in name. That temporary law is now the subject of case law;
- Board members are being appointed during an outgoing administration and that is not allowed.
Virus Truth is doing well in that sense because it is spending a lot of time and money filing and litigating against a cabinet that has demitted itself under the cunningly well-timed false pretext of the surcharges affair. The temporary measures covid-19 law should never have been passed because it institutes measures that involve more than a marginal issue. That should have been left to a subsequent cabinet, but my prediction that that formation would take an enormously long time has come true because, as a war cabinet, one can steam along for a nice long time without significant resistance.
Wikipedia is clear about whether or not it is allowed to make major controversial decisions:
Purely legally, a caretaker cabinet is fully competent: it can submit bills, make decisions, represent the Netherlands abroad. However, there is a general idea that such a cabinet should limit itself to urgent matters and subjects that are not politically controversial. Controversial issues, so the idea goes, should be left to the next cabinet that again has the confidence of the House of Representatives: "You should not want to rule over your grave."
Of course, what opposition parties like Forum for Democracy (FvD) should have done immediately was to withdraw confidence from the prime minister and the full cabinet in order to force new elections. They did not exercise that option. Ah yes, after all, all swear allegiance to the king; including the opposition parties.
If an entire cabinet resigns and it is not possible to repair the cabinet again, there must always be new elections to the House of Representatives. This goes along with a decision to dissolve the House of Representatives. This is because forming a new cabinet is such an important decision that it cannot be taken without a new mandate from the voters.
What Virus Truth is actually doing now by litigating is giving legitimacy to the outgoing administration that wrongfully passed a mega-sized temporary law. Where the focus of opposition should be (among both opposition political parties and an opposition group like Virus Truth) is to stop accepting the authority of the cheating power.
If you start proceedings against the state and against the measures enshrined in laws and measures, you ostensibly criticize the measures, but you go to a judge who "administers justice" based on that law. In other words, you spend a lot of time and money visiting the butcher's judge appointed by the butcher himself. The outcome is invariably predetermined. Indeed, you thereby give legitimacy to the butcher who is cheating, by taking a seat in the room of his appointed judge.
All the court cases then lead to a ruling, and that case law gives additional weight to the state's actions. You went to the butcher's inspector and the inspector approved the meat. With that, you have to accept that you bought horse meat for steak because you failed to name the heart of the matter. That heart of the matter is:
The butcher cheats and the judge belongs to the butcher / the government cheats and the judge serves the law of the government
The king has also proven cheating, because he just appointed new secretaries of state. That is not allowed. But oh well, we'll just leave that dear King William out of it.
We are simply not going to make it with lawsuits and demonstrations. It looks very interesting, and it does give weight to the perceived value of resistance, but real resistance can only be effective if you simply stop cooperating and so precisely do not go to court. By going to court you are giving your approval to a falsely rigged system of the judge appointed by the cheating butcher.
Although Virus Truth in its press conference today meanwhile also reinforces the comparison with the situation of the 1930s before World War II by fencing with Jewish organizations, there too, it is presumably accelerating towards a lawsuit that will hound the comparison into a legal ban, because we are once again going with official organizations instead of just shitting on the cheating state and its Orwellian double speak and speech correctness en masse.
We don't need Jewish organizations to get approval on whether or not calling state policies fascism is correct. It is fascism. Period.
In summary, however, I still give Virus Truth a ten for their role of opposition. Brilliant! There is little to criticize. Chapeau! Small criticism is that they never addressed the contamination lie, which could have effectively wiped out the ground under any measure, but okay. Another minor criticism is that you give the butcher authority by sitting down with his judge, but okay. So the bottom line is: controlled opposition does not exist and we're not going home yet, not by a long shot. Oh yes, and please read the article below before continuing. In love and patience, Martin
Source link entries: wikipedia.org
Please note that the articles on this site are increasingly being shared and read. It is the share counters below that are blocked by social media APIs, making it seem as if not shared. Hang in there, keep going and be non-conformist.
13 Comments
A small sidetrack from the main topic of this article.
The permanent nature of the "Temporary Covid-19 Measures Act" is already hidden in its name. What is in quotation marks is the official name for the law. No matter where this name is written in a sentence, the word "Temporary" is capitalized.
In the Dutch language, there are only two situations where a word is capitalized. That is at the beginning of a sentence, and for names.
"Temporary," by being written with a capital letter, is thus no longer a time indicator, but a name. Faint and mean grammatical game.
In digging out that law, it also just becomes clear in the legal text. Article VIII describes the sunset provision of this law. It describes that the law expires after 3 months. The law can also be extended (partially) by a "royal decree." That sounds like the Crown has some say in that, but it doesn't mean that. A RD is taken by the minster who is responsible for it (in this case the extremely reliable Grapperhaus) without control from the second and first chamber. Further, there is no hard end date set and no limit to the number of renewals. This has the potential to keep extending the law "as long as deemed necessary."
Moral of the story in the words of George Carlin: the game is rigged!
So back to the main point of the article: stop playing along!
https://youtu.be/AeRd0EJbkC0
The royal decree is left by law to the minister, but that law that determines it is itself signed by the king, and so the king is always ultimately responsible because the minister has sworn allegiance to the king. It is always the king who determines; the rest are executors of the order through the appearance of demos-cracy.
The royal house itself is knee-deep in the WEF/SDR build back better agenda of the usual suspects, so don't expect any relaxations, rather refined measures. The farmers will be expropriated anyway, the plan is to turn madurodam into a megacity within the E.U.
In 2007, when I warned those close to me after the signing of the Lisbon Treaty that they had handed over the last bit of sovereignty to Brussels, I was laughed out loud. The average madurodammer still has great faith in the system after 14 years, I wish them strength in the time ahead.
https://twitter.com/MinPres/status/1220059404290183170/media_tags
In conclusion, the Davos World Economic Forum has indeed been involved in the strategic management of the coronavirus pandemic, with a major emphasis on using the pandemic as a catalyst for digital transformation and the global introduction of digital identity systems.
https://swprs.org/the-wef-and-the-pandemic/
small addition:
WEF is Front for Rothschild World Tyranny
https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/10/wef-front-rothschild-world-tyranny.html
In fact, the founder and president of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, was having breakfast with Rabbi Arthur Schneier at his Park East Synagogue in New York when the two jets struck the World Trade Center, Schneier said.
https://www.jta.org/2002/02/05/lifestyle/religion-has-role-at-economic-forum
https://web.archive.org/web/20071024154410/https://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=77744
Mbt the agriculturists as predicted:
https://twitter.com/eatlovepray211/status/1448893781512802325
So is it really useless to start proceedings? Stefan Lanka was also vindicated during the measles trial. Surely a proceeding into the proof of God's pardon could not turn out otherwise, especially if we have God called as witnesses!
Anyone reading this who wants to do it? A lawyer? lawyer in training?
Crash the system before they do it, it will happen anyway, we can do it as well but on our terms.
By confusing their agenda and timeline.
Forget demonstrations, politics and the justice system, they don't work in our favor.
So the idea is to:
Fuck up AI by being unpredictable, stay absolutely legal, and save our planet from Climatechange !
No joke, you don't even have to risk your job, just start your car and slowdown the traffic everywhere you can, fight them Klimanazis 😉
In small teams of 5-20 drivers just taking it easy along all the traffic hotspots in your country, organize offline in decentralized groups and make the shit stop, everyone can partcipate, no risk!
So please gentleman, start your engines and save the Planet !
Operation Schnecke - Ich bremse fürs Klima!
https://t.me/ichbremsefuersklimag/1773
Perhaps it would be even more effective if litigated, arguing that there is no scientific evidence of Cov-SAR-2. It has never been dissected. There is no scientific evidence of the virus. A person in Alberta, Canada was able to avert his imposed fine that way.
Stop litigating, stop paying fines and start saying "I do not accept your authority.
I don't understand why you act like I'm talking out of my neck.
That is the essence: 'I do not accept your authority!'
Litigation has no use because judges have to follow the orders of the communist Masonic/red toga judges, the "do-gooders". If you are not willing to follow their orders you can't become a judge in this country, uber at all you have to have a Masonic affinity to be "elected" as a judge at all (no this job requirement is not in the job posting being applied for), or if you do slip in and you don't behave according to the instructions/Agenda then you will be kicked out. Simple as that. Judges under the Agenda should not consider facts, facts are not important, should not do fact-finding either. Judges are not interested in the facts, do not want to hear the facts, do not want to know the facts. To laws/human rights they have contempt if it does not match/comply with the Agenda.
It's time people understood that. Judges only make the decision they MAY make from above anyway. Judges are not independent and must answer for their decisions to their superiors. In the court they are the senior judges of the respective Sectors of the court who keep an eye on the judges to make sure they follow instructions.
We live in a quiet, subtle dictatorship where the Freemasons are not only represented but even over-represented in every important/agency.
A caste system which rules the roost over the common people using trickery, deceit, fraud etc etc.
Did the same, went out during curfew in early February. Got fined, objected and asked for proof of God's grace. I am still waiting for a substantive answer, apart from the message that the file was sent from department a to department b. But about those proceedings, will they go so far as to have a verdict 2+2=5? Seems like a lot of fun, besides not accepting their authority, to put them on the block to call God as witnesses!