"A clean bred virus is the same as an isolated virus(32:40 min.)," is one of the many groundbreaking statements of this "expert" Peter Borger in this long and shooting from left to right conversation with Tom Zwitser of Blue Tiger studios; the bookseller for all the Judas goat books and for a well-stocked bookshelf of 95% truth plus disinfo. Peter Borger is a shill in the Pierre Capel, Robert Malone and Willem Engel category, inundating the truth seeker with portions of truth mixed with nonsense.
Feel free to watch, but be alert to the hypnosis techniques of going back and forth and throwing unfamiliar terms and numbers around to get your mind into acceptance mode, because you must feel like it's over your head.
(min 47:30) "So if someone comes to me and says viruses don't exist, I say well they can't because we know about them and we also know approximately how they come about. So that's one thing I don't go along with". Indeed, Peter has argued all that theoretically in his book "Back to the Origins," in which he has launched hypotheses about where viruses might come from, but in which he does not come up with evidence. So he has actually provided "irrefutable proof" with only hypotheses. "That's a theory I don't go along with."
Peter Borger and Pierre Capel now want to focus the reader's attention on "gain of function," so Peter's video comes shortly after I undercut Pierre Capel. It has to happen, because liars like this cunningly keep you in the force field of so-called critical thinking (because, after all, you are a critical thinker) and so you get a tzunami of nice-sounding terms that add up to nothing.
For example, what Peter explains well is how CRISPR works. What he also explains well is that 'gain of function' involves cutting and pasting with sequences. If you use the word "sequences," it sounds very interesting because it's English and it rolls nicely over the tongue, but it's actually "a piece"; pieces of RNA (has 1 string, while DNA has two strings) are pasted together. It's like lego. You have a box full of cubes and pick out a few and when you sequence them together you have a lego work of art.
However, what he deliberately and so dangerously proclaims throughout his story - and that is where his first comment begins - is that viruses simply exist. He doesn't substantiate that, but puts extra force to it because he (this actor) has researched the origins of existence and thus discovered that Darwinism was bullshit and so (yes well, just like Wouter Raatgever) he has converted. This immediately appeals to 75% of the listeners, since the Netherlands is still ecclesiastical in its DNA. He argues that viruses are like mutating parasites; despite the fact that they have no living cell nucleus and have never been seen by anyone.
But then, according to Peter Borger (who has to safeguard the virus lie), that is not necessary. The idea that you have to isolate or be able to see viruses, he says, belongs to the era when science was not so far advanced. You need to focus on "gain of function" while being skillfully hypnotized with disinfo.
Indeed, according to Peter, you can spot viruses simply on the basis of (there's the cleverly chosen word again) sequences. He even takes the trouble to dismiss Stefan Lanka (at 47: 45 min.) as someone you shouldn't pay attention to. In doing so, he equates having a "reinculture" with isolating a virus and effectively wards off having zero evidence by saying, "But then to say we absolutely don't have the virus, that's not true," under the guise of "Believe me. It's true!", as Donald Trump used to say so beautifully. "I say it so it's true," is the new science of "experts"; the new faith.
In addition, he may report at length that his friend and scientist who worked for the UMC was not fired because the PCR would not work, but because he had raised the point that this PC R does not work well, because it gives too many false positives. And so Peter Borger, along with Tom Zwitser, chats your ear off in Jiskefet style. Watch the video and read on below.
Everything revolves around making you believe that viruses exist; that it's fine that you don't have to isolate them "because they just exist"; that viruses are made up of Lego blocks (with the word sequencing as a hypnotic anchor throughout the conversation); that you can test with a PCR test; that it's fine to use a culture of dead animal kidney cells and fetal cells to "purify viruses"; and that the big danger comes from labs' "gain of function" studies. As icing on the dessert, there is a sequence (the hypnotic anchor word) that is also found in breast cancer.
"A pure cultured virus is the same as an isolated virus(32:40 min.)" So what is that, pure bred? Well that would be that you are using an original virus (which is how the gentlemen gibberish nicely). "So then you do research on viruses you already have."
I would like to ask Peter Borger how he got that original virus then, because although he ridicules Stefan Lanka, we should actually ridicule him, Peter Borger. After all, he himself admits that no virus has ever been isolated. The argument to that effect is that (note, here he comes again) one knows the sequences. Aha, so we know the lego blocks from which the original virus is composed on the basis that no one has ever been able to actually isolate a virus and thus say, "look here is the original virus and it is composed of these and these lego blocks."
Of something you have never seen, you cannot know how it is built. "Yes, but we have the sequences and so we can see with tests that those sequences are in it"; "Are in what?"; "In the virus."; "But you've never seen that virus?"; "No."; Then how do you know what it's composed of?"; "Well science is just much further along than it was a hundred years ago." No, you are talking nonsense Peter Borger, actor, great deceiver and country traitor!
All that the ladies and gentlemen scientists do is rely on something that they have never seen before and for which they have devised (instead) a computer model: "Look, this is the original!"; "How do you know that?"; "Just look at the computer screen, and you'll see it!"; "But that's a computer model of what?"; "Of the virus."; "But you've never seen that before?"; "No, but we do have the sequences, just look at the model on the screen." How easily people allow themselves to be hypnotized in this kind of conversation full of conversational hypnosis techniques.
So when you do "gain of function" research, you use the computer model on the screen and you go and combine the computer models of alpha, beta, omicron (or others) with each other and make terribly dangerous computer models. You know this because (you should mockingly think) you cannot isolate those alpha, beta and omicron variants. And you don't have to, because you have the (because you've never seen them) computer models; which in themselves are also based on something you've never seen. So basically you are doing "gain of function" on a computer fantasy model? Yes, one has nothing, does research on that nothing and then merges nothing with nothing.
But what are they testing for with the PCR tests? On pieces (there's the Lego brick word again) of sequence from a made-up computer model of nothing (because never seen it). If you are susceptible to hypnosis, then by the talk you will probably be fully convinced that viruses are contagious and that "gain of function" is the greatest threat to humanity. And so Red Bull kept the discussion where it wanted it (see this commentary).
If you pay close attention to the body language of evil boys Swiss and Borger, you can see that they know they are about to fall through.
Stefan Lanka sums it up for you again in the video below. And if you don't understand what he is saying, read the last four paragraphs or this article again. So how people did get sick and how the infection illusion was created can be heard and seen here.
Link entry: deblauwetijger.com
17 Comments
I watched for 10 minutes. that's all I could hold out. I used to hate it as a kid when someone answered "because I say so" when I asked why. Peter is clearly that kind of guy: it's so because he says so. I can't listen to that for long and therefore have probably never been hypnotized, fortunately 🙂 .
I didn't watch at all,because such idiots are better not to invite, can't watch it.
A year or so ago I had a conversation with a character who told me that mercury is a body's own substance,yes really,such guys should be hung immediately,that's obvious.
Unrighteous people,who make statements against their better judgment,that are not near the truth,are entitled to imprisonment,also Peter Borger is a candidate.
I don't want to comment too much on it,because I'm already cooking at the computer again.
Martin,you have an awesome site and love your approach,unsalted, I love that.
Discovered your site last week,and am going to mention it to everyone I know.
Read some of your articles,with the sometimes hidden humor and thought-throughs.
Enjoy it every day,TOPPIE Martin.
A great asset on the internet.
Bird.
I suggest collecting 3 hairs from a Chinese, an African and a European, put them side by side and have people wonder which one is the most contagious and dangerous....
Can also be done with, say, dead skin flakes from the relevant world inhabitants....
It is the same material as a so-called "virus.
This involves something we can perceive ourselves and who knows how dangerous that is yay!
(Oh, by the way, autumn is also perilous with all those dead leaves from the trees, they must be giant infectious!)
An invisible enemy like a so-called "virus" (barely get the word out of my throat anymore) is ironclad.
Like the dangerous water monster that grabs you if you get too close to the water's edge, at least that's what I was told as a young child by my mother.
I am extremely curious to know how dangerous the hair and flakes are....
Seems to me that the Stefan Lanka Tom Cowan Andy Kaufman gang is just yet another layer offered up by the same deceptive entity. One red flag being their collaboration with Icke ...they offer up the virus lie truth but I can't help but think that we're being set up just as with all of their other layers....
That, presumably, is certainly the case. The last line; couple it with a scandal and BOOM, sunk is the ship.
The Nov. 6 protest on Dam Square in Amsterdam is sure to be a fun psychological operation.
Frankly, I think Stefan Lanka is certainly sincere. So is Thomas Cowan.
Andrew Kaufman, like David Icke, was also pushed by London Real and that Brian Rose is a Freemason with connections to MI5/6 so I have less confidence in that.
What you see is that the controlled opposition has to capture every issue and pull it towards itself, because that way it can be linked to the big names. That linkage allows the mainstream media and politics to throw out the baby with the bathwater by mounting a scandal a la Alex Jones, as described in this article:
https://www.martinvrijland.nl/nieuws-analyses/de-thierry-baudet-david-icke-en-alex-jones-booby-trap/
Andy Kaufman is a slick , and I don't trust his collaboration with David Icke either, but that could be ignorance. Stefan Lanka and Thomas Cowan I find reliable so far, but if anyone has other information I would like to hear it. Dr. Cowan = 33, but that in itself means nothing.
This is WHY an isolate is NOT an isolated virus:
Clear explanation of Terrain Theory vs Germ Theory by Joas Westh (A Dane with a mission)
https://odysee.com/@Terrain_Theory:5/Germ-Theory_-The-greatest-lie-ever-told-Copy:5
Very much worth a look.
Did a good search for the expression "pure virus," both in medical encyclopedia and
in biology textbooks you don't come across the expression or that kind of virus.
Even Mr. google doesn't know anything about it. Look for yourself.
Confident and plentiful, Borger seems to know it, he's just sweating it, but he's not the only one and that's then the alternative media blowing up the nonsense to yet another power, is not a joke but seriousness.
It seems like Borger talks about blood, "pure blood" : blood of nobility and that kind of terminology they use in special clubs.
Mr. Borger should just apologize to all those unsuspecting dear people who are unknowingly driven by him into the labyrinth of hell
He even talks about a "pure bred virus," huh?
So that culture consists of kidney cells from monkeys and humans mixed with fetal cells from a baby (abortions enough) and then you cobble that together and then you put a drop of lung mucus in there and that is then the definition of a 'pure cultured virus'? Indeed; it is the definition of 'isolation of a virus'!
But a "pure cultured virus" by definition contradicts itself. A virus cannot be pure if the definition of virus were correct, but a mixture of culture as described above is well not exactly pure either.
The only in which the word pure would be appropriate here is in: sheer nonsense!
Sometimes it is better to imagine everything simply: the -theo-rie that diseases would be contagious is totally illogical.
If there were diseases that were "contagious," then doctors and health care professionals would have to be much more sick than other people. After all, they come into contact with sick people every day. On the other hand, how many would still want to become doctors or healthcare professionals. After all, one runs the risk of contracting an "infectious disease" every day? And what about the insurance premiums? If one's profession would really put one at greater risk, then surely premiums should be higher for healthcare professionals?
Whence this illogic?
Doctors and healthcare professionals are simply taught in school that there would be diseases that are "contagious. However, most follow training without asking questions because they prefer not to question the 'master' because they want to pass their training. Similarly, politicians, alternative media, medical representatives, medical court experts do not always ask many questions or simply follow the herd. It is taught that way, so it must be so... Also, it is not so easy to go against the herd. (see the asch experiment, among others)
Given there is no logic to the story, someone can always come up with a "magic solution" that obviously costs some money ... but where there is no proof that it would help.
The logic was never there: the rule of keeping 1.5 meters distance was never respected. In the vaccination centers one came to be less than 1.5 meters away. If one wanted to follow the rule then one simply could not vaccinate.
What a joke.
Just that arrogant and uninterested sitting posture of this man. Blehhhh.
Those books in the header photo are also placed just right 🙂 .
Peter "I'm not going to question that" Borger, what a scary man and evil liar.
It suddenly occurred to me: Tom Swiss is of course just a subliminal for Dom Zwetser!
But, of course, he could also be a TomTom* Switcher: change of direction
(* TomTom is the forerunner of Google Maps = direction pointer)
At least it is secured by Peter (Petra, "the cornerstone on which we build," according to the Bible) Borger (who must secure the virus lie).
Peter Borger: the cornerstone that secures the virus lie.